Abstract:Background: The proliferation of misinformation on social media is a significant concern due to its frequent occurrence and subsequent adverse social consequences. Effective interventions for and corrections of misinformation have become a focal point of scholarly inquiry. However, exploration of the underlying causes that affect the public acceptance of misinformation correction is still important and not yet sufficient. Objective: This study aims to identify the critical attributions that influence public acceptance of misinformation correction by using attribution analysis of aspects of public sentiment, as well as investigate the differences and similarities in public sentiment attributions in different types of misinformation correction. Methods: A theoretical framework was developed for analysis based on attribution theory, and public sentiment attributions were divided into 6 aspects and 11 dimensions. The correction posts for the 31 screened misinformation events comprised 33,422 Weibo posts, and the corresponding Weibo comments amounted to 370,218. A pretraining model was used to assess public acceptance of misinformation correction from these comments, and the aspect-based sentiment analysis method was used to identify the attributions of public sentiment response. Ultimately, this study revealed the causality between public sentiment attributions and public acceptance of misinformation correction through logistic regression analysis. Results: The findings were as follows: First, public sentiments attributed to external attribution had a greater impact on public acceptance than those attributed to internal attribution. The public associated different aspects with correction depending on the type of misinformation. The accuracy of the correction and the entity responsible for carrying it out had a significant impact on public acceptance of misinformation correction. Second, negative sentiments toward the media significantly increased, and public trust in the media significantly decreased. The collapse of media credibility had a detrimental effect on the actual effectiveness of misinformation correction. Third, there was a significant difference in public attitudes toward the official government and local governments. Public negative sentiments toward local governments were more pronounced. Conclusions: Our findings imply that public acceptance of misinformation correction requires flexible communication tailored to public sentiment attribution. The media need to rebuild their image and regain public trust. Moreover, the government plays a central role in public acceptance of misinformation correction. Some local governments need to repair trust with the public. Overall, this study offered insights into practical experience and a theoretical foundation for controlling various types of misinformation based on attribution analysis of public sentiment.

"I am sorry for judging you": conceptualizing sentiment reversal among followers in case of falsely alleged social media influencer transgression

Social Media Influencers and Followers: Theorization of a Trans-Parasocial Relation and Explication of Its Implications for Influencer Advertising

Authentic isn't always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration

Unfaithful brands: How brand attachment can lead to negative responses to influencer marketing campaigns

Community Fact-Checks Trigger Moral Outrage in Replies to Misleading Posts on Social Media

Hope You’re Not Totally Commercial! Toward a Better Understanding of Advertising Recognition's Impact on Influencer Marketing Effectiveness

Guilty When Proven Innocent? The Lingering Negative Effects of False Accusations on Trust and Organizational Decision-Making

Consumers' ambiguous perceptions of advertising disclosures in influencer marketing: Disentangling the effects on current and future social media engagement

Investigation of Public Acceptance of Misinformation Correction in Social Media Based on Sentiment Attributions: Infodemiology Study Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

When endorsers behave badly: consumer self-expression and negative meaning transfer

How Does Social Media Influencer Credibility Blow the Promotional Horn? A Dual Mediation Model

Social Media Influencers as a Crisis Risk in Strategic Communication: Impact of Indiscretions on Professional Endorsements

Unethical but not illegal! A critical look at two-sided disinformation platforms: Justifications, critique, and a way forward

Social Media Influencers’ Traits and Purchase Intention: A Moderated Mediation Effect of Attitude Towards Brand Credibility and Brand Familiarity

Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media

Under the Influence: Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Response to Corporate Reputation Advertising

Examining the motivations of sharing political deepfake videos: the role of political brand hate and moral consciousness

Fake news land? Exploring the impact of social media affordances on user behavioral responses: A mixed-methods research

Influencer Marketing: Role of Influencer Credibility and Congruence on Brand Attitude and eWOM

The blame game: Understanding blame assignment in social media

Moral Sparks in Social Media Narratives