Coordinated planning of DGs and soft open points in multi‐voltage level distributed networks based on the Stackelberg game

Zhihua Chen,Ye He,Yuting Hua,Hongbin Wu,Rui Bi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12963
IF: 3.034
2024-02-09
IET Renewable Power Generation
Abstract:Aiming at the problem of different consumption capacities at different voltage levels distribution networks and the divergence of interests among investment entities, a coordinated planning model for distributed generators and soft open points based on the Stackelberg game is proposed in this paper. There are significant differences in distributed generators (DGs) distribution and load characteristics between different voltage levels, which makes it difficult to match sources and loads. We focus on the problem of different consumption capacities at different voltage levels and the divergence of interests among investment entities, and propose a coordinated planning model for DGs and soft open points (SOPs) based on the Stackelberg game. Firstly, a model of a multi‐voltage level distribution networks (DNs) is constructed based on SOPs. Next, the source‐load matching degree is proposed as a measure of the degree of matching between sources and loads in the DN, and the source‐load consumption rate is selected as an indicator to evaluate the impact of the load on DG consumption. Following this, the interest demands of DG investors and distribution company (DisCo) in multi‐voltage levels DN are analyzed, a planning mode based on the Stackelberg game is proposed, and this is solved by combining the genetic algorithm with second‐order cone programming. Finally, the effectiveness of the planning model is tested and verified using an improved IEEE 28‐node system. The results show that the proposed model improves the DG consumption capacity of DNs with multiple voltage levels while protecting the interests of DG investors and DisCo.
energy & fuels,engineering, electrical & electronic,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?