Priority of PET-CT vs CT Thorax for EBUS-TBNA 22G vs 19G: Mesothorax Lymphadenopathy

Paul Zarogoulidis,Haidong Huang,Zhenli Hu,Ning Wu,Jiannan Wang,Dimitris Petridis,Kosmas Tsakiridis,Dimitris Matthaios,Christoforos Kosmidis,Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt,Christos Tolis,Ioannis Boukovinas,Nikolaos Courcoutsakis,George Nikolaidis,Chrysanthi Sardeli,Chong Bai,Chrysanthi Karapantzou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.59892
IF: 3.9
2021-01-01
Journal of Cancer
Abstract:<b>Introduction:</b> Lung lesions and undiagnosed mesothorax lymphadenopathy is an issue that several doctors face in the everyday clinical practice. PET-CT and CT of the thorax are usually the first examinations to identify characteristics of the lesions before biopsy. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective study with 450 patients that had EBUS-TBNA with 22G, Upgraded 22G and 19G needles with and without PET-CT in order to identify the cost effeteness of performing EBUS-TBNA before or after PET-CT. All centers used the same PET-CT equipment and EBUS-TBNA system. Three types of needle were used for the endoscopy in order to identify similarities and differences for the cost-effectiveness. The costs in every center for every examination and materials were the same. <b>Results:</b> There were more block slices for 19G&gt;22Gupgraded&gt;21G&gt;22G and there was cost-effectiveness when in general PET-CT was performed prior to biopsy of any lesion. 19G needle was more effective for lymphomas, while 22Gupgraded and 21G needles were more cost-effective when used for smaller lesions for primary lung cancer of metastatic disease. <b>Conclusions:</b> We have been using PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA in the everyday clinical practice according to the current guidelines for initial disease staging and re-staging. However; we can also use both in a cost effective method based on the initial radiologic findings.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?