Effects of Hemoadsorption with a Novel Adsorbent on Sepsis: In vivo and in vitro Study

Jicheng Zhang,Zhiyong Peng,Donald Maberry,Jacob Volpe,Jeremy D. Kimmel,William J. Federspiel,John A. Kellum
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000381006
2015-01-01
Blood Purification
Abstract:Background/Aims: Hemoadsorption may improve outcomes for sepsis by removing circulating cytokines. We tested a new sorbent used for hemoadsorption. Methods: CTR sorbent beads were filled into columns of three sizes: CTR0.5 (0.5 ml), CTR1 (1.0 ml) and CTR2 (2.0 ml) and tested using IL-6 capture in vitro. Next, rats were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture and randomly assigned to hemoadsorption with CTR0.5, CTR1, CTR2 or sham treatment. Plasma biomarkers were measured. Results: In vitro, IL-6 removal was accelerated with increasing bead mass. In vivo, TNF, IL-6, IL-10, high mobility group box1, and cystatin C were significantly lower 24 h after CTR2 treatment. Seven-day survival rate was 50, 64, 63, and 73% for the sham, CTR0.5, CTR1, CTR2, respectively. Conclusion: CTR appeared to have a favorable effect on kidney function despite no immediate effects on cytokine removal. However, CTR2 beads did result in a late decrease of cytokines.
hematology,urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?