Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers

Kari Oline Bøifot,Gunnar Skogan,Marius Dybwad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12735-7

IF: 3.307

2024-05-26

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Abstract:Aerosol microbiome studies have received increased attention as technological advancements have made it possible to dive deeper into the microbial diversity. To enhance biomass collection for metagenomic sequencing, long-term sampling is a common strategy. While the impact of prolonged sampling times on microorganisms' culturability and viability is well-established, its effect on nucleic acid stability remains less understood but is essential to ensure representative sample collection. This study evaluated four air samplers (SKC BioSampler, SASS3100, Coriolis μ, BioSpot-VIVAS 300-P) against a reference sampler (isopore membrane filters) to identify nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling. Physical sampling efficiencies determined with a fluorescent tracer for three particle sizes (0.8, 1, and 3 μm), revealed high efficiencies (> 80% relative to reference) for BioSampler, SASS3100, and BioSpot-VIVAS for all particle sizes, and for Coriolis with 3 μm particles. Coriolis exhibited lower efficiency for 0.8 μm (7%) and 1 μm (50%) particles. During 2-h sampling with MS2 and Pantoea agglomerans , liquid-based collection with Coriolis and BioSampler showed a decrease in nucleic acid yields for all test conditions. BioSpot-VIVAS displayed reduced sampling efficiency for P. agglomerans compared to MS2 and the other air samplers, while filter-based collection with SASS3100 and isopore membrane filters, showed indications of DNA degradation for 1 μm particles of P. agglomerans after long-term sampling. These findings show that long-term air sampling affects nucleic acid stability in both liquid- and filter-based collection methods. These results highlight bias produced by bioaerosol collection and should be considered when selecting an air sampler and interpreting aerosol microbiome data.

environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of different types of air samplers on the stability of nucleic acids in bioaerosols during long-term sampling. Specifically, the study evaluated the effectiveness of four air samplers (SKC BioSampler, SASS3100, Coriolis μ, and BioSpot-VIVAS 300-P) in maintaining nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling compared to a reference sampler (isopore membrane filter).

The background of the study highlights that with technological advancements, research on aerosol microbiomes has garnered increasing attention. Long-term sampling is a common strategy to enhance the biomass collection for metagenomic sequencing. While the impact of long-term sampling on the culturability and activity of microorganisms has been extensively studied, its effect on nucleic acid stability remains unclear, which is crucial for ensuring the collection of representative samples.

The test models used in the paper include the fluorescent tracer Uranine and two model organisms—Gram-negative bacterium Pantoea agglomerans (PA) and bacteriophage MS2. By comparing the physical sampling efficiency of different samplers under various particle sizes and analyzing the nucleic acid recovery and stability of PA (double-stranded DNA) and MS2 (single-stranded RNA) under short-term (10 minutes) and long-term (2 hours) sampling conditions, the researchers aimed to reveal whether long-term sampling leads to a decrease in nucleic acid yield.

The results of this study are significant for understanding how different sampling principles and techniques affect nucleic acid stability in aerosol microbiome research, especially when long-term sampling is required to obtain sufficient biomass for metagenomic sequencing. These findings assist researchers in selecting appropriate air samplers and better interpreting aerosol microbiome data.