Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Mohammed S. Abusamaan,Jeromie Ballreich,Adrian Dobs,Brian Kane,Nisa Maruthur,John McGready,Kristin Riekert,Amal A. Wanigatunga,Mary Alderfer,Defne Alver,Benjamin Lalani,Benjamin Ringham,Fatmata Vandi,Daniel Zade,Nestoras N. Mathioudakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08177-8
IF: 2.728
2024-05-19
Trials
Abstract:Prediabetes is a highly prevalent condition that heralds an increased risk of progression to type 2 diabetes, along with associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an established effective intervention for diabetes prevention. However, participation in this 12-month lifestyle change program has historically been low. Digital DPPs have emerged as a scalable alternative, accessible asynchronously and recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Yet, most digital programs still incorporate human coaching, potentially limiting scalability. Furthermore, existing effectiveness results of digital DPPs are primarily derived from per protocol, longitudinal non-randomized studies, or comparisons to control groups that do not represent the standard of care DPP. The potential of an AI-powered DPP as an alternative to the DPP is yet to be investigated. We propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to directly compare these two approaches.
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?