Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study
Kristen K. Curtis,Nathan J. Fakult,Jennifer L. Strunck,Sumaira Z. Aasi,Christine S. Ahn,Murad Alam,Anna A. Bar,Ramona Behshad,Christopher K. Bichakjian,Diana Bolotin,Susan L. Boone,Jeremy S. Bordeaux,Jerry D. Brewer,David R. Carr,John A. Carucci,Jason R. Castillo,Sean R. Christensen,Melanie A. Clark,Lindsey K. Collins,Addison M. Demer,Daniel B. Eisen,Hao Feng,Bahar F. Firoz,Roy C. Grekin,Jason M. Hirshburg,Todd E. Holmes,Conway C. Huang,Thomas A. Jennings,Shang I. Brian Jiang,Sailesh Konda,Justin J. Leitenberger,Jesse M. Lewin,Ian A. Maher,Elise Ng,Ida F. Orengo,Faramarz H. Samie,Drew K. Saylor,Victoria Rose Sharon,Teo Soleymani,Susan M. Swetter,Jesalyn A. Tate,Marta J. Van Beek,Nahid Y. Vidal,Alok Vij,Ashley Wysong,Yaohui Gloria Xu,Bryan T. Carroll,Wesley Y. Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036
IF: 12.6934
2024-07-30
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Abstract:Background : Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood’s lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.
oncology