ICG-Fluorescence for Margin Assessment During Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6548

2024-04-20

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study of patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal liver metastasis resections assesses the use of indocyanine green–fluorescence imaging to achieve a higher radical resection rate and greater accuracy in estimating the resection tumor-margin status.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in minimally invasive surgery, can the complete resection rate (R0 resection rate) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) be improved by using near - infrared fluorescence imaging technology (ICG - fluorescence imaging), and evaluate the accuracy of ICG - fluorescence imaging in predicting the resection margin status.

### Specific problems and goals:

1. **Improve the R0 resection rate**:
- This study aims to evaluate whether ICG - fluorescence - guided surgery is associated with a higher R0 resection rate. R0 resection means that the resection margin is at least 1 millimeter away from the tumor during tumor resection, which is the standard to ensure complete tumor resection.

2. **Evaluate the accuracy of ICG - fluorescence imaging**:
- The study also evaluated the accuracy of ICG - fluorescence imaging in predicting the resection margin status in real - time during the operation (i.e., determining whether there is a positive resection margin, R1 resection). Specific indicators include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

### Research background:

- **Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)**: Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients will develop colorectal liver metastases during the course of their disease. For CRLM, the ideal surgical method is partial hepatectomy, ensuring that the resection margin is at least 1 millimeter away to achieve complete resection (R0 resection), thereby improving local disease control and 5 - year survival rate.

- **Challenges in minimally invasive surgery**: Although minimally invasive surgery (such as laparoscopic or robot - assisted surgery) has the advantages of reducing hospital stay and complications, the lack of tactile feedback makes tumor identification, resection planning, and margin assessment more difficult. Therefore, new imaging methods are needed to make up for this deficiency.

### The role of ICG - fluorescence imaging:

- **Real - time feedback**: ICG - fluorescence imaging can provide real - time tumor margin feedback during the operation, helping surgeons more accurately judge the margin status, thereby increasing the possibility of complete resection.

- **Adjust surgical strategy**: If the ICG - fluorescence signal indicates that there may be a positive resection margin, the surgeon can immediately adjust the resection plane or re - resect additional tissue to ensure an adequate margin.

### Conclusion:

This study shows that ICG - fluorescence imaging is associated with a higher R0 resection rate and provides real - time feedback on the tumor margin during the operation, which helps to improve the complete resection rate. In addition, ICG - fluorescence imaging also shows a certain accuracy in predicting the margin status, especially with 92% accuracy in predicting R0 resection.

### Mathematical formula representation:

- **R0 resection rate**: Defined as the proportion of the resection margin being at least 1 millimeter away from the tumor during tumor resection, and the formula is:
\[
R0\text{ resection rate}=\frac{\text{Number of R0 - resected lesions}}{\text{Total number of resected lesions}}\times100\%
\]

- **Diagnostic accuracy indicators**:
- Sensitivity: \(\frac{\text{True positive}}{\text{True positive}+\text{False negative}}\)
- Specificity: \(\frac{\text{True negative}}{\text{True negative}+\text{False positive}}\)
- Positive predictive value (PPV): \(\frac{\text{True positive}}{\text{True positive}+\text{False positive}}\)
- Negative predictive value (NPV): \(\frac{\text{True negative}}{\text{True negative}+\text{False negative}}\)

These indicators are used to evaluate the accuracy of ICG - fluorescence imaging in predicting the margin status.