Extrachromosomal DNA driven oncogene spatial heterogeneity and evolution in glioblastoma
Imran Noorani,Magnus Haughey,Jens Luebeck,Andrew Rowan,Eva Grönroos,Francesco Terenzi,Ivy Tsz-Lo Wong,Jeanette Kittel,Chris Bailey,Clare Weeden,Donald Bell,Eric Joo,Vittorio Barbe,Matthew G Jones,Emma Nye,Mary Green,Lucy Meader,Emma Jane Norton,Mark Fabian,Nnennaya Kanu,Mariam Jamal-Hanjani,Thomas Santarius,James Nicoll,Delphine Boche,Howard Y Chang,Vineet Bafna,Weini Huang,Paul S Mischel,Charles Swanton,Benjamin Werner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.22.619657
2024-10-25
Abstract:Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is strongly associated with treatment resistance and shorter survival for patients with cancer, including patients with glioblastoma. The non-chromosomal inheritance of ecDNA during cell division is a major contributor to intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. At present, the spatial dynamics of ecDNA, and the impact on tumor evolutionary trajectories, are not well understood. Here, we investigate the spatial-temporal evolution of ecDNA and its clinical impact by analyzing tumor samples from 94 treatment-naive human IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. We developed a spatial-temporal computational model of ecDNA positive tumors ('SPECIES') that integrates whole-genome sequencing, multi-region DNA FISH, and nascent RNAscope, to provide unique insight into the spatial dynamics of ecDNA evolution. Random segregation in combination with positive selection of ecDNAs induce large, predictable spatial patterns of cell-to-cell ecDNA copy number variation that are highly dependent on the oncogene encoded on the circular DNA. EGFR ecDNAs often reach high mean copy number (mean of 50 copies per tumor cell), are under strong positive selection (mean selection coefficient, s > 2) and do not co-amplify other oncogenes on the same ecDNA particles. In contrast, PDGFRA ecDNAs have lower mean copy number (mean of 15 copies per cell), are under weaker positive selection and frequently co-amplify other oncogenes on the same ecDNA. Evolutionary modeling suggests that EGFR ecDNAs often accumulate prior to clonal expansion. EGFR structural variants, including vIII and c-terminal deletions are under strong positive selection, are found exclusively on ecDNA, and are intermixed with wild-type EGFR ecDNAs. Simulations show EGFRvIII ecDNA likely arises after ecDNA formation in a cell with high wild-type EGFR copy number (> 10) before the onset of the most recent clonal expansion. This remains true even in cases of co-selection and co-amplification of multiple oncogenic ecDNA species in a subset of patients. Overall, our results suggest a potential time window in which early ecDNA detection may provide an opportunity for more effective intervention.
Cancer Biology