Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Wage-led or profit-led: is it the right question to examine the relationship between income inequality and economic growth? Insights from an empirical stock-flow consistent model for Denmark

Functional income distribution, effective demand and wealth in Denmark – insights from an empirical stock-flow consistent model

Wage‐led versus profit‐led demand: A comprehensive empirical analysis

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Functional income distribution and sluggish growth in Europe: the post-Keynesian debate on wage- or profit-led growth models

Rising Income Inequalities – the Causes of and Consequences for Long-term Growth

Functional distribution of income, aggregate demand, and economic growth in the Chinese economy, 1978–2007

Wage inequality and induced innovation in a classical-Marxian growth model

FDI inflows and income inequality: A Schumpeterian economic growth

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Top-end inequality and growth: empirical exploration of nonlinearities and the time dimension

A Kaleckian growth model of secular stagnation with induced innovation

Earnings, labor market dynamics, and inequality in Sweden

Are there inequality spillovers? Evidence through a modified inequality measure and European dynamics of inequality

Aggregate Demand Externalities, Income Distribution, and Wealth Inequality

How does income inequality affects economic growth at different income levels?

An Empirical Model of Growth Through Product Innovation

Structural reforms and income distribution: new evidence for OECD countries

Decoupling of functional and household income distribution by economic growth: new findings from analysing the three‐way growth‐equity nexus

On the Nature Reasons for the Long-Term Non-Linearity of Economic Development

Is the Financial Market Driving Income Distribution? – an Analysis of the Linkage between Income and Wealth in Europe