Study of pollutant accumulation characteristics and microbial community impact at three bioretention facilities

Ya-jiao Li,Heng Fu,Jing-yu Zhang,Zhao-xin Zhang,Jia-ke Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13801-0

IF: 5.8

2021-04-13

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:In this paper, three bioretention facilities (BT, RG1-A, and RG1-B) were selected for on-site testing and experimental analysis. Of which, BT is a roadside bioretention tank with layered filler, while RG1-A and RG1-B are rain gardens with conventional filler (Bioretention soil media, BSM) and modified filler (BSM+10% Water treatment residuals,WTR), respectively. The effect of pollutant accumulation on the soil microbial community structure in the facilities, and the risk of heavy metal contamination over several years of bioretention facility operation were studied. Results showed that the water quality pollutant load reduction in BT was fluctuating. This is related  to the poor water quality of road stormwater flowing into BT and the facility filler. Because RG1-B uses modified filler, RG1-B was more effective than RG1-A in regulating water quality and quantity; the changes in soil physical and chemical properties in BT, RG1-A, and RG1-B were influenced by external factors. Next, BT was at high risk of heavy metal contamination than other facilities. The microbial community structure of the facility had the following characteristics: at the phylum level, <i>Proteobacteria</i> was the dominant phylum in the bioretention facility, accounting for 29–45%; and at the genus level, <i>Blastocatella</i> was the dominant phylum, and the relative abundance in situ was higher than that in the bioretention facility. The results of the correlation analysis combining filler environmental factors and microbial community structure indicated that SMC was a highly influential factor among the three facilities.

environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily discusses the issue of pollutant accumulation characteristics and the impact on soil microbial community structure in three different bioretention facilities with varying fill materials (BT, RG1-A, and RG1-B) in treating stormwater runoff. The study selected three bioretention facilities for on-site testing and experimental analysis, where BT is a roadside bioretention pond with layered fill, while RG1-A and RG1-B are rain gardens using traditional fill material (bioretention soil media, BSM) and modified fill material (BSM+10% water treatment residuals, WTR), respectively.

The research focused on the impact of pollutant accumulation on the soil microbial community structure within the facilities and the risk of heavy metal pollution after the bioretention facilities had been in operation for several years. The results indicated that the BT facility's effectiveness in reducing water pollutant loads was highly variable, which was related to the poor quality of the roadway stormwater entering BT and the facility's fill material. RG1-B, which used modified fill material, was more effective in regulating water quality and quantity compared to RG1-A. Changes in the soil physicochemical properties in BT, RG1-A, and RG1-B were influenced by external factors. Additionally, there was a higher risk of heavy metal pollution in the BT facility. Microbial community structure characteristics showed that at the phylum level, Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in the bioretention facilities, accounting for 29%-45%; at the genus level, Blastocatella was the dominant genus, with a higher in situ relative abundance than in the bioretention facilities. Correlation analysis results between fill material environmental factors and microbial community structure indicated that soil moisture content (SMC) was one of the most influential factors in all three facilities.

The paper also detailed the experimental methods, including sampling methods, detection methods, and statistical analysis methods, and reported the effects of the bioretention facilities on water volume reduction and pollutant load removal, as well as changes in the physical and chemical properties of the fill material and heavy metal content. Through these studies, the paper provides reference value for strengthening environmental pollution risk management and extending the service life of bioretention facilities.