Abstract:Modeling of human intestinal absorption (HIA) data of 175 diverse drugs and 336 calculated descriptors is performed to develop global predictive models that are applicable to the whole medicinal chemistry space. With this aim, we employed two automated procedures, (a) Sphere Exclusion Algorithm (SEA) to select members of the training and test sets based on structural dissimilarity and (b) k‐Nearest Neighbors (kNN) method along with Genetic Algorithms (kNN‐QSAR‐GA) to select significant and independent descriptors. This methodology helped us to derive optimal Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) models based on three and four descriptors. The best three descriptor model is based on Delta Chi Index of order 3 (Cluster), Hydrogen type E‐State index ShsOH, AlogP99 ($\rm{ q_{{\rm{LOO}}}^2 }$=0.7401 and $\rm{ q_{{\rm{ext}}}^2 }$=0.7989); the best four variable model is based on auto‐correlation descriptor (Moran) weighted by atomic weights – order 7, AI‐State_Indices_AISssssC, number of hydrogen bond acceptors, AlogP99 ($\rm{ q_{{\rm{LOO}}}^2 }$=0.8196 and $\rm{ q_{{\rm{ext}}}^2 }$=0.6999). Based on extensive validation tests of the models M1–M4, comparison of their overall performance and $\rm{ q_{{\rm{ext}}}^2 }$ statistics with reported models using other approaches, it is shown that: (a) the models have high stability and are robust and (b) for the first time in HIA modeling, the combination of an automated training set selection (SEA) followed by variable selection (kNN‐QSAR_GA) is shown to be a promising methodology to build multiple stable models that are useful in consensus prediction. From the analysis of the physical meaning of the selected descriptors, it is inferred that the HIA of small organic compounds can be accurately predicted using calculated descriptors that code for the following fundamental properties: (1) lipophilicity, (2) hydrogen bonding capacity, (3) size, and (4) shape and further, the role of new calculated descriptors on the HIA profile of small organic compounds is uncovered. Finally, as the models reported herein are based on computed properties, they appear to be a valuable tool in virtual screening, where selection and prioritization of candidates is required.

Receptor Surface Models. 2. Application to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Studies

Quantitative Structure–activity Relationship: Promising Advances in Drug Discovery Platforms

Structure‐activity Relationship Approaches and Applications

QSAR Modeling: Where Have You Been? Where Are You Going To?

Improving the quality of 3D-QSAR by using flexible-ligand receptor models.

Regression Methods For Developing Qsar And Qspr Models To Predict Compounds Of Specific Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic And Toxicological Properties

Computer Modeling for Interaction of Ligands and Receptors and Their Applications in Drug Design

Quantitative Sequence-Activity Model (qsam): Applying Qsar Strategy to Model and Predict Bioactivity and Function of Peptides, Proteins and Nucleic Acids

Predictive QSAR Models for Polyspecific Drug Targets: the Importance of Feature Selection

3D-QSAR and Receptor Modeling of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors with Flexible Atom Receptor Model (FLARM).

How Precise Are Our Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Derived Predictions for New Query Chemicals?

Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling

A Concise Review on role of QSAR in Drug Design

Assessment of Prediction Confidence and Domain Extrapolation of Two Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Predicting Estrogen Receptor Binding Activity

Molecular Modeling: Origin, Fundamental Concepts and Applications Using Structure-Activity Relationship and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery

QSAR: Using the Past to Study the Present

Predictive QSAR Models of 3-Acylamino-2-aminopropionic Acid Derivatives As Partial Agonists of the Glycine Site on the NMDA Receptor

In Silico ADME Modeling 3: Computational Models to Predict Human Intestinal Absorption Using Sphere Exclusion and kNN QSAR Methods

Quantum mechanical quantitative structure-activity relationships to avoid mutagenicity

Quantitative Structure Retention-Relationship Modeling: Towards an Innovative General-Purpose Strategy