Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy

Danilo Buonsenso,Beatrice Berti,Concetta Palermo,Daniela Leone,Gloria Ferrantini,Roberto De Sanctis,Roberta Onesimo,Antonietta Curatola,Lavinia Fanelli,Nicola Forcina,Giulia Norcia,Sara Carnicella,Simona Lucibello,Eugenio Mercuri,Marika Pane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24814

IF: 4.0899

2020-05-11

Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To investigate ultrasound features of diaphragm motion and function in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA‐1) patients.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Design</h3><p>Prospective study.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Patients</h3><p>The study cohort included SMA‐1 children younger than 18‐year‐old. Control subjects included type 2 and type 3 SMA and other neuromuscular disorders younger than 18‐year‐old.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methodology</h3><p>Diaphragm ultrasound evaluating diaphragmatic excursion, speed of diaphragmatic contraction, duration of the respiratory cycle, inspiratory/expiratory relationship, end‐inspiratory and ‐expiratory thickness, thickening fraction, and pattern of contractility. The interrater reliability for each variable was established by calculation of Cohen's <i>k</i> coefficient. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Twenty‐three SMA‐1 patients and 12 controls were evaluated. Diaphragm ultrasound values were within normal ranges in all study cohort patients and no difference was found with controls. There was a gradient of diaphragm function with SMA 1.9 subgroup having the best and SMA 1.1 having the worst parameters, particularly in end‐inspiratory thickness and diaphragmatic excursion (<i>P</i> = .031 and <i>P</i> = .041, respectively). Seventy‐four percent of SMA‐1 patients had a dysmotility pattern of diaphragm contraction, mostly represented in SMA 1.9 subgroup (<i>P</i> = .001). This pattern was observed in 92.8% of children on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for less than 16 hours/d of and in 20% patients with invasive ventilation or NIV for more than 16 hours/d (<i>P</i> = .027). The dysmotility pattern was never observed in the control group. The levels of interobserver agreement were high for "diaphragm irregularities," "inspiratory/expiratory relationship," and "diaphragm thickness," and good for the other variables. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Ultrasound can be used to evaluate diaphragm function and contractility in SMA‐1 children, providing additional information to the clinical examination and functional respiratory tests, describing a characteristic contractility pattern in these patients. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand the impact of diaphragm dysmotility and other parameters on long‐term outcome in SMA‐1 patients.</p></section>

pediatrics,respiratory system