Abstract:The thesis of this paper is that the role of debt and its relationship with equity in the firm, due to recent significant developments in the corporate finance markets after the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, has been transformed. The relatively new, but already very experienced private credit funds, are competing with banks in a dynamic market which is full of unforeseen and large-scale risks. The paper examines private credit funds and compares their business model to bank financing from a corporate governance perspective. The paper shows that modern debt providers (i) are interested in the firm's profit maximisation, (ii) are dynamically involved in the governance of the firm also outside financial distress, and that (iii) corporate loan financing agreements are often expected to be renegotiated (repriced). The paper argues that outside financial distress, debt and equity have become even more overlapping and intertwined than they used to be.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of the evolving role of corporate debt financing in non-financial distress and its impact on corporate governance. Specifically:
1. **Changes in the Role of Debt Financing**: The paper points out that after the global financial crisis (2007-2008), the corporate financing market underwent significant changes, especially with private credit funds beginning to compete with traditional banks and becoming important debt providers. These emerging debt providers have had a profound impact on corporate governance.
2. **Modern Debt Governance Mechanism**: The paper proposes a concept of "modern debt governance," exploring how debt holders continuously influence companies through dynamic mechanisms (such as floating interest rates, periodic repricing, etc.). This influence extends beyond periods of financial distress to include the company's daily operations.
3. **Overlap Between Debt and Equity**: The paper emphasizes that modern debt providers (such as private credit funds) are very interested in maximizing corporate profits and actively participate in corporate governance. Additionally, debt financing agreements often require renegotiation, further blurring the lines between debt and equity.
4. **Changes in the Legal Framework**: The paper also discusses the impact of the legal framework on debt governance, particularly how debt holders protect their interests through various control measures during non-financial distress periods, thereby influencing corporate governance.
In summary, the paper aims to explore how modern debt financing reshapes corporate governance structures and proposes a new theoretical framework for debt governance.