Abstract:Objectives: The use of local or regional anesthesia (LRA) is encouraged during transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) since the procedure is performed through a small incision. LRA permits neurologic evaluation during the procedure and may reduce periprocedural cardiac morbidity compared to general anesthesia (GA). There is limited and conflicting information regarding the preferred anesthesia to use during TCAR. We compared periprocedural clinical and technical complications, and intraprocedural performance metrics of TCAR performed under GA versus LRA. Methods: Patient, lesion, physician, and procedural information was collected in a worldwide quality assurance program of consecutive TCAR procedures. A composite clinical adverse event rate (death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction) and a composite technical adverse event rate (aborted procedure, conversion to carotid endarterectomy, bleeding, dissection, cranial-nerve injury, device failure) in the periprocedural period were computed. Four intraprocedural performance measures (flow-reversal time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and skin-to-skin time) were recorded. Deidentified data were analyzed independently at the Center for Vascular Research, Univ of Maryland. Poisson regressions were used to assess the impact of anesthesia type on adverse event rates. Linear regressions were used to compare performance measures. Results: A total of 27,043 TCARs were performed by 1,456 physicians between 2012 and 2021. A majority (83%) of patients received GA, and this proportion increased over time (R2=0.74, p<0.0001). Some physicians (33.4%) used LRA in some of their procedures; only 2.7% used LRA in all of their procedures. Clinical risk-factors were more common in the LRA group (p<0.0001), and anatomic risk-factors in the GA group (p<0.0001); these differences were adjusted for in subsequent analyses. LRA was more likely to be used by vascular surgeons and by physicians with higher prior transfemoral carotid stenting experience (p<0.0001). When comparing GA vs. LRA, clinical adverse events (1.49% [95% CI 1.3,1.8] vs 1.55% [1.2,2.0], p=0.78), technical adverse events (5.6% [5.2,6.2] vs 5.3% [4.5,6.3], p=0.47), and intraprocedural performance measures did not differ by type of anesthesia. Conclusions: Almost 2/3rds of physicians performed TCAR exclusively under GA, and the overall proportion of procedures performed under GA increased over time. A larger fraction of patients with severe medical risk-factors received LRA vs. GA, while a larger fraction of patients with anatomic risk-factors received GA. Periprocedural clinical and technical adverse events did not differ by type of anesthesia. Intraprocedural performance metrics that drive procedural cost were similar between groups; potential differences in procedural cost driven by anesthetic choice require further study.

Abstract No. 572 Review of Carotid Balloon Test Occlusion in the Contemporary Era of Electronic Anesthesia Records: Systematic Analysis of Angiography and Physiologic Data

New Technologies in the Assessment of Carotid Stenosis: Beyond the Color-Doppler Ultrasound—High Frame Rate Vector-Flow and 3D Arterial Analysis Ultrasound

Retrospection of Artery Balloon Test Occlusion of Internal Carotid Occlusion

[Endovascular balloon occlusion test of the internal carotid artery with increased hemodynamic monitoring for determination of circulatory reserve before planned carotid occlusion]

[Application and Reliability of Balloon Occlusion Test in Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases].

Impact of the type of anesthesia on adverse events during transcarotid artery revascularization

107 Conventional Catheter-based Angiography Versus Non-invasive Imaging in the Evaluation of Symptomatic Carotid Disease

Anesthesia on Clinical Outcomes in an Extended Time Window During Endovascular Stroke Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of the ANGEL-ACT Registry

Current Practices in Carotid Surgery

Angiographic Circulation Time and Cerebral Blood Flow during Balloon Test Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery

General Versus Nongeneral Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Study on 25 000 Patients

Clinical uncertainty in large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: does automated perfusion imaging make a difference? An intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study

Abstract TP153: Basilar Artery Occlusion Management: Specialist Perspectives From After The BEST Of BASICS Study

Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data

Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments

Hemodynamic Analysis of Carotid Artery after Endarterectomy: a Preliminary and Quantitative Imaging Study Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics and Magnetic Resonance Angiography

706 Radial Versus Femoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract TP34: Cerebrovascular Nursing Voice Is Critical, Information-Technology Listened, And Posterior Stroke Signs And Care Documentation Improved

In Vivo Characterization of Carotid Neointimal Hyperplasia by use of Optical Coherence Tomography: Before and After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty

Predicting Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Adverse Outcomes by Imaging Characteristics

Abstract WMP95: Anesthesia Modality in Endovascular Treatment for Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Intention-to-Treat Matched Analysis