Significant mitral regurgitation after permanent right ventricular pacemaker implantation: prognostic implications

Takeru Nabeta,Xavier Galloo,Laurens Tops,Jan Stassen,Nina Ajmone Marsan,Pieter van der Bijl,Jeroen J Bax
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.003
IF: 3.133
2024-05-09
The American Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:The underlying mechanisms leading to the development of mitral regurgitation (MR) after right ventricular (RV) pacemaker (PM) implantation and its prognostic value have yet to be fully understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical variables associated with the development of MR after RV pacing and its association with outcomes. A total of 451 patients (mean age 69 ± 15 years, 61% male) who underwent de novo RV PM implantation were included. The development of significant MR, defined as ≥ moderate from mild or none/trace at baseline, occurred in 131 (29%) patients at a median of 2.4 years [interquartile range (IQR): 1.0-3.8 years] after PM implantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that implantation of a single-chamber PM, LV end-systolic volume index and the presence of mild MR (vs no MR) at baseline were independently associated with the development of significant MR post-implant. Cardiac events, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, occurred in 143 patients (31.7%) during a median follow-up of 5.4 years [IQR: 3.0-8.1 years]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the development of significant MR was independently related to the occurrence of cardiac events. In conclusion, the development of significant MR after PM implantation is seen in about one third of recipients and is independently associated with adverse cardiac events.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?