Decision Change: The First Step to System Change

Arnold J. Bomans,Peter Roessingh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062372
IF: 3.9
2024-03-14
Sustainability
Abstract:Global crises, such as climate change and ecological collapse, require changes in systemic factors that cause the crises. These factors include the economy, population growth, and decision-making in global affairs. Current decision-making processes have failed to accomplish the required system change, necessitating a change to these processes ('decision change') for meaningful progress. The key question is how a procedure for deciding on the required system change should be designed in this setting. In this essay, we propose a three-step approach. First, independent experts in collective decision-making should design this procedure under monitoring by auxiliary bodies that safeguard the design process; second, proposals for system change should be collected; third, based on these proposals, system change should be designed and decided upon using the new decision-making procedure. We argue that authority can be given to the new decision-making body that decides on system change. A global team must convene the decision-making experts and auxiliary bodies, collect system-change proposals, and guarantee that the decision-making process is facilitated. We call on individuals and independent organisations to form such a team or support its formation.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What Problem Does the Paper Attempt to Solve? The paper explores the systemic changes required to address global crises (such as climate change and ecological collapse) and points out that the current decision-making processes have failed to achieve the necessary systemic changes. The paper proposes a three-step approach to designing new decision-making procedures: 1. **Expert-designed procedures**: New decision-making procedures are designed by independent experts in the field of collective decision-making under the supervision of regulatory bodies. 2. **Proposal collection**: Various proposals for systemic change are collected. 3. **Formulation and decision-making**: Based on these proposals, the newly designed decision-making procedures are used to decide on specific plans for systemic change. The core issue of the paper is: How to design a new procedure for deciding on the necessary systemic changes in an appropriate context? The authors argue that an independent team of experts is needed to design this procedure and call for individuals and independent organizations to participate in or support the formation of this team.