Methodological artefacts cause counter‐intuitive evolutionary conclusions in a simulation study

Loke von Schmalensee,Mats Ittonen,Anna Brødsgaard Shoshan,Kevin T. Roberts,Isabelle Siemers,Philip Süess,Christer Wiklund,Karl Gotthard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14439
IF: 11.274
2024-06-13
Ecology Letters
Abstract:In their simulation study, Garcia‐Costoya et al. (2023) conclude that evolutionary constraints might aid populations facing climate change. However, we are concerned that this conclusion is largely a consequence of the simulated temperature variation being too small, and, most importantly, that uneven limitations to standing variation disadvantage unconstrained populations. In their simulation study, Garcia‐Costoya et al. (2023) conclude that evolutionary constraints might aid populations facing climate change. However, we are concerned that this conclusion is largely a consequence of the simulated temperature variation being too small, and, most importantly, that uneven limitations to standing variation disadvantage unconstrained populations.
ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?