The effect of excessive gas to blood ratios in an ECMO oxygenator

Michael Shaw,Nigel Cross,Rebecca Richardson,Richard Crook,Timothy Thirulchelvam,Richard W Issitt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241256089

2024-05-25

Perfusion

Abstract:Perfusion, Ahead of Print. IntroductionOxygenators for paediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are required to operate over a wide range of flow rates, in a patient group ranging from neonates through to fully grown adolescents. ECMO oxygenators typically have a manufacturer's stated maximum gas: blood flow rate (GBFR) ratio of 2:1, however, many patients require greater ratios than this for adequate CO2 removal. Mismatches in GBFR in theory could result in high gas phase pressures. These increased pressures in theory could cause the formation of gross gaseous microemboli (GME) placing the child at higher risk of neurological injury.MethodsWe evaluated 6 paediatric and 6 adult A.L.ONETM ECMO oxygenators and assessed their gas phase pressures and GME release, in an ex vivo setting, in GBFR ratios up to greater than 2, across a range of gas flow (1L – 10 L/min) rates with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) content of 50% and 100%.ResultsThere were no increases above 10 mmHg observed in gas phase pressures in GBFR >= 2:1 in either adult or paediatric oxygenators. Laboratory examination of GME activity demonstrated a small increase in post-membrane GME release over the study period. GME release was unaffected by FiO2 setting or gas flow rate, with a maximum volume of < 6 μL in both paediatric and adult oxygenators.ConclusionsIn an ex vivo setting, increasing GBFR above 2:1 in a paediatric oxygenator, and to a GBFR of 2:1 in an adult oxygenator did not significantly increase gas phase pressures, and no oxygenator membrane rupture was observed. There were no associations between gas flow rates and GME production.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease