Abstract:The 2008–2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has swayed regulators to set forth the Solvency II agreement for determining Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for insurance companies. In this paper, we apply novel internal models to investigate whether the latest version of the Solvency II standard model demands sufficient capital charges, both in normal and stressed times, for the different risk categories included in bond and stock portfolios. Because the GFC has shown that extreme events on the tail of probability distributions can occur quite often, our empirical findings indicate that the magnitude of the equity risk using the GJR–EVT–Copula method requires insurers to keep more SCR for stock portfolios than the Solvency II standard model. In the case of a bond portfolio, we conclude that the Solvency II standard model requires approximately the same SCR as our internal model for the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, whereas the standard model overestimates SCR for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds. At the same time, the standard model underestimates interest-rate risk and overestimates spread risk. Overall, the discrepancies in the estimated SCRs between the Solvency II standard technique and our internal models increase as the level of the risks rise for both stock and bond markets. Our empirical results are in line with other competing internal modeling techniques regarding stock market investment and bond portfolios with the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, while for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds, the results contradict other modeling procedures. The obtained empirical results are interesting in terms of theory and practical applications and have important implication for compliance with the Solvency II capital requirements. Likewise, it can be of interest to insurance regulators, policymakers, actuaries, and researchers within the field of insurance and risk management.

Capital allocation and risk appetite under Solvency II framework

On a capital allocation principle coherent with the Solvency 2 standard formula

Capital allocation and RORAC optimization under solvency 2 standard formula

Capital Allocation Methods under Solvency II: A Comparative Analysis

A risk management approach to capital allocation

A bridge between Local GAAP and Solvency II frameworks to quantify Capital Requirement for demographic risk

Risk Aversion in Regulatory Capital Principles.

Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation

Solvency assessment within the ORSA framework: issues and quantitative methodologies

Fair estimation of capital risk allocation

A Risk Based Approach for the Solvency Capital Requirement for Health Plans

Efficient Valuation of SCR via a Neural Network Approach

Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk

Capital Requirements for Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance: An Analysis of Solvency II, the U.S. Risk-Based Capital Standards, and the Swiss Solvency Test

RecessionRisk+: A Novel Recession Risk Model with Applications to the Solvency II Framework and Recession Crises Forecasting

Allocation d'actifs selon le critère de maximisation des fonds propres économiques en assurance non-vie

A Unified Approach to Systemic Risk Measures via Acceptance Sets

Multilevel Monte-Carlo for computing the SCR with the standard formula and other stress tests

Measuring market and credit risk under Solvency II: evaluation of the standard technique versus internal models for stock and bond markets

Capital allocation for cash-subadditive risk measures: from BSDEs to BSVIEs

A novel scaling approach for unbiased adjustment of risk estimators