Five-Precision GMRES-Based Iterative Refinement
Patrick Amestoy,Alfredo Buttari,Nicholas J. Higham,Jean-Yves L’Excellent,Theo Mary,Bastien Vieublé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1549079
IF: 1.908
2024-02-10
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Abstract:SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Volume 45, Issue 1, Page 529-552, March 2024. GMRES-based iterative refinement in three precisions (GMRES-IR3), proposed by Carson and Higham in 2018, uses a low precision LU factorization to accelerate the solution of a linear system without compromising numerical stability or robustness. GMRES-IR3 solves the update equation of iterative refinement using GMRES preconditioned by the LU factors, where all operations within GMRES are carried out in the working precision [math], except for the matrix–vector products and the application of the preconditioner, which require the use of extra precision [math]. The use of extra precision can be expensive, and is especially unattractive if it is not available in hardware; for this reason, existing implementations have not used extra precision, despite the absence of an error analysis for this approach. In this article, we propose to relax the requirements on the precisions used within GMRES, allowing the use of arbitrary precisions [math] for applying the preconditioned matrix–vector product and [math] for the rest of the operations. We obtain the five-precision GMRES-based iterative refinement (GMRES-IR5) algorithm which has the potential to solve relatively badly conditioned problems in less time and memory than GMRES-IR3. We develop a rounding error analysis that generalizes that of GMRES-IR3, obtaining conditions under which the forward and backward errors converge to their limiting values. Our analysis makes use of a new result on the backward stability of MGS-GMRES in two precisions. On hardware where three or more arithmetics are available, which is becoming very common, the number of possible combinations of precisions in GMRES-IR5 is extremely large. We provide an analysis of our theoretical results that identifies a relatively small subset of relevant combinations. By choosing from within this subset one can achieve different levels of tradeoff between cost and robustness, which allows for a finer choice of precisions depending on the problem difficulty and the available hardware. We carry out numerical experiments on random dense and SuiteSparse matrices to validate our theoretical analysis and discuss the complexity of GMRES-IR5.
mathematics, applied