Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics

Camille D. Ryan,Elizabeth Henggeler,Samantha Gilbert,Andrew J. Schaul,John T. Swarthout

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2318027

2024-02-27

GM crops & food

Abstract:Labels are influential signals in the marketplace intended to inform and to eliminate buyer confusion. Despite this, food labels continue to be the subject of debate. None more so than non-GMO (genetically modified organisms) labels. This manuscript provides a timeline of the evolution of GMO labels beginning with the early history of the anti-GMO movement to the current National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard in the United States. Using media and market intelligence data collected through BuzzsumoTM and MintelTM, public discourse of GMOs is analyzed in relation to sociopolitical events and the number of new food products with anti-GMO labels, respectively. Policy document and publication data is collected with OvertonTM to illustrate the policy landscape for the GMO topic and how it has changed over time. Analysis of the collective data illustrates that while social media and policy engagement around the topic of GMOs has diminished over time, the number of new products with a GMO-free designation continues to grow. While discourse peaked at one point, and has since declined, our results suggest that the legacy of an anti-GMO narrative remains firmly embedded in the social psyche, evidenced by the continuing rise of products with GMO-free designation. Campaigns for GMO food labels to satisfy consumers' right to know were successful and the perceived need for this information now appears to be self-sustaining.

biotechnology & applied microbiology,plant sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Address

This paper aims to explore the development of genetically modified organism (GMO) labeling and its impact on the market and society. Specifically, the paper examines the following aspects through the analysis of social media, policy documents, and market data:

1. **Factors, participants, and events influencing the GMO narrative**: The paper traces the evolution of GMO labeling from the early anti-GMO movement to the current U.S. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (NBFDS), analyzing the impact of key legislative and political factors on the GMO narrative.

2. **Consumer perception of GMOs**: The paper investigates how different groups describe and influence consumer perceptions of GMOs and how these perceptions have changed over time.

3. **Progress of GMO narratives in policy documents**: The paper analyzes the trends in discussions and policy-making regarding GMOs in policy documents.

4. **Market trajectory of GMO-labeled products**: The paper uses market data to show the trend in the number of products with GMO-free labels over time.

### Background and Motivation

Despite the scientific consensus that genetically modified foods are safe and have undergone rigorous regulatory approval and safety testing, there remains controversy and misinformation about the safety of GMOs in social and political spheres. This controversy not only affects public perception of GMOs but also drives the growth of the non-GMO labeling market. By comprehensively analyzing social media, policy documents, and market data, the paper seeks to uncover the reasons behind these controversies and market dynamics.

### Research Methods

1. **Social Media Analysis**: Using the BuzzSumo™ platform, the paper collects and analyzes 117,654 unique online articles from March 2009 to September 2020, covering 19,610 unique websites. The total number of these articles and their social media interactions were analyzed.

2. **Policy Document Analysis**: Using the Overton™ platform, the paper collects and analyzes 45,994 policy documents from March 2009 to 2023, covering policy documents, parliamentary records, government guidance, and think tank research from over 180 countries. The number and sources of mentions of GMOs in these documents were analyzed.

3. **Market Data Analysis**: Using the Mintel™ platform, the paper collects and analyzes 95,367 unique food products released from January 1996 to August 2020, including products with GMO-free labels. The trends in these products over time were analyzed.

### Key Findings

1. **Trends in Social Media Interactions**: Since June 2011, online conversations and interactions about GMOs have shown an upward trend, peaking around the 2012 California Prop 37 vote, and then gradually declining. This may be related to the resolution of GMO labeling in the U.S., the COVID-19 pandemic, global political events, and other factors.

2. **Trends in Policy Documents**: The number of policy documents regarding GMOs increased between 2011 and 2022, particularly driven by international agreements (such as the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety) and consumer "right to know" movements.

3. **Market Trends**: Despite the decrease in online narratives and policy discussions about GMOs, the number of products with GMO-free labels continues to grow. This indicates that the legacy of anti-GMO narratives remains deeply ingrained in the social psyche.

### Conclusion

By comprehensively analyzing social media, policy documents, and market data, the paper reveals the complex history and market dynamics of GMO labeling. Despite the scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified foods, social and political controversies persist, driving the continued growth of the non-GMO labeling market. The paper's analysis provides valuable insights into the evolution of the GMO narrative.