Urban 3D building morphology and energy consumption: empirical evidence from 53 cities in China

Yang Wang,Guiquan Sun,Yingmei Wu,Mark W. Rosenberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63698-1
IF: 4.6
2024-06-07
Scientific Reports
Abstract:The impact of building morphology on building energy consumption has been extensively studied. However, research on how 3D building morphology affects energy consumption at a macroscopic scale is lacking. In this study, we measured the mean building height (BH), mean building volume (BV), and mean European nearest neighbor distance (MENN) of the city to quantify the 3D building morphology. We then used a spatial regression model to analyze the quantitative impact of urban 3D building morphology on per capita electricity consumption (PCEC). Results indicate that at the macroscopic scale of the city, the BH and the MENN have a significant positive impact on the PCEC, while the BV has a significant negative impact on the PCEC. Moreover, the inclusion of the 3D building morphology greatly improves the model's ability to explain building energy efficiency, surpassing the impact of traditional economic factors. Considering the 3D building morphology indicators together, buildings with a lower height, a larger volume, and a more compact 3D morphology have greater potential for energy savings and are more conducive to electricity conservation. This study offers valuable insights for the energy-efficient arrangement of buildings.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: the impact of urban three - dimensional building forms on building energy consumption, especially how to quantify and analyze this impact on a macro scale. Specifically, the research aims to quantify three - dimensional building forms by measuring the average building height (BH), average building volume (BV) and mean Euclidean nearest - neighbor distance (MENN), and use the spatial regression model to analyze the quantitative impact of these form indicators on per capita electricity consumption (PCEC). ### Research Background and Problems 1. **Urban Energy Consumption and Building Energy Consumption** - Cities consume more than two - thirds of the world's energy and generate a large amount of pollutants and carbon dioxide. - Buildings contribute 40% of the world's energy consumption and 28% of carbon emissions. - China's "Total Energy Consumption Control" plan aims to limit the national energy consumption within 6000 Mtce by 2030, covering all industries, including the construction industry. 2. **Limitations of Existing Research** - Although a large number of studies have explored the impact of building forms on energy consumption, most of them focus on two - dimensional spatial forms and lack in - depth exploration of three - dimensional building forms. - There are fewer studies on a macro scale, especially in the context of multiple cities. ### Research Objectives - **Quantify Three - Dimensional Building Forms**: Quantify urban three - dimensional building forms by measuring the average building height (BH), average building volume (BV) and mean Euclidean nearest - neighbor distance (MENN). - **Analyze the Impact on Energy Consumption**: Use the spatial regression model (such as the spatial Durbin model SDM) to analyze the impact of these form indicators on per capita electricity consumption (PCEC). - **Provide Policy Recommendations**: Provide a scientific basis for the government to formulate urban planning and building energy - saving policies. ### Main Findings - **Average Building Height (BH) and Mean Euclidean Nearest - neighbor Distance (MENN)** have a significant positive impact on per capita electricity consumption, that is, the higher the building and the larger the building spacing, the higher the electricity consumption. - **Average Building Volume (BV)** has a significant negative impact on per capita electricity consumption, that is, the larger the building volume, the lower the electricity consumption. - **Combining Three - Dimensional Building Form Indicators** can significantly improve the model's ability to explain building energy efficiency, exceeding the influence of traditional economic factors. ### Conclusions Cities with lower - height, larger - volume and compact three - dimensional form buildings have greater energy - saving potential and are helpful for saving electricity. This research provides valuable insights for energy - efficient building design and supports the goal of the Chinese government to build a resource - saving and environment - friendly society.