Validation of the Arabic Version of the Attitude Toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain Questionnaire
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s449265
2024-05-17
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Ahmed S Alhowimel, 1 Collins Ogbeivor, 2 Ahmad Dalli Alruwaili, 3 Omar M Morizn, 1 Abdulaziz Aljamaan, 1 Aqeel M Alenazi, 1 Norah A Alhwoaimel, 1 Mohammed M Alshehri, 4 Bader A Alqahtani, 1 Faris A Alodaibi 5 1 Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia; 2 Department of Physical Rehabilitation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3 Joint Clinic, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4 Physical Therapy Department, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia; 5 Department of Rehabilitation Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Ahmed S Alhowimel, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia, Tel +96611558888, Email a.a; Purpose: This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Attitude toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain (AxEL) Questionnaire. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted in two phases. First, the AxEL questionnaire was translated into Arabic and cross-culturally adapted. Second, the psychometric properties (such as validity) of the translated AxEL were evaluated. Results: The results showed that back translators and language specialists had no trouble translating the AxEL. The translators' agreement was very high (88.2%), and the questionnaire items were logically and clearly translated from English into Arabic. Conclusion: The Arabic version of AxEL is a valid tool that can assess individuals' beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain (LBP). It fills a significant void in cross-cultural research and can help healthcare providers understand the attitudes and beliefs influencing individuals' management of LBP within the Arabic context. Keywords: education, low back pain, outcome measures Individuals experiencing lower back discomfort frequently encounter work-related limitations. 1 The Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) 2 highlighted an increase in disability days attributed to low back pain (LBP) over the past three decades. This trend is expected to continue, exacerbating the burden on global healthcare systems. To mitigate this issue, evidence recommends prioritizing advice, education, and reassurance as foundational strategies in LBP management. 3–6 This implies that, irrespective of the duration of a patient's LBP, healthcare practitioners are encouraged to promote physical activity actively, offer education and reassurance on the nature of LBP, and spread awareness that this condition is not a severe illness. However, a systematic review of the health information needs of people who experience LBP found that there was a disparity between the recommended treatment prescribed in the clinical practice guidelines for the initial treatment of LBP and the actual therapy. Several factors pertaining to healthcare providers and patients contribute to the underutilization of first-line therapies. Foster et al 7 reported that clinicians frequently express concerns regarding insufficient time and resources to provide optimal primary care during the initial consultation. Slade et al 8 discovered that patients' treatment expectations and attitudes significantly influenced medication adherence to first-line therapies. Clinicians informed by patients' perspectives on first-line treatment options could deliver more effective and efficient consultations despite the constraints of their time. Clinicians possess the ability to modify their approaches toward patient care in accordance with the patients' emotional states and personal expectations, which can enhance patient satisfaction, the efficacy of primary care interventions, and treatment outcomes. 9 Conducting research on patients' perspectives of the first treatment options for LBP could help physicians determine the preferred first-line therapies of individuals with this condition. Surveys designed to assess the subjective experiences of individuals experiencing pain face several methodological challenges. A prevalent issue arises when assessments simply evaluate one aspect of an individual's attitude, compounded by several individuals undergoing the examination. The Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale is used to assess an individual's perspectives and emotions regarding persistent pain, as well as their capacity to engage in job activities while experiencing pain. Darlow et al 10 and Slater et al 11 suggested that a limited number of 15 "ye -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal