Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the association of standardized prenatal imaging parameters and immediate neonatal variables with mortality prior to discharge in infants with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (LCDH), and to compare the performance of ultrasound‐ and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐based severity grading for the prediction of neonatal mortality. Methods This was a retrospective study of infants with prenatally diagnosed isolated LCDH referred to a single tertiary center between 2008 and 2020. Fetuses with right or bilateral congenital diaphragmatic hernia, additional major structural anomaly or known genetic condition, as well as cases that underwent fetal intervention or declined postnatal intervention, were excluded. Ultrasound and MRI images were reviewed retrospectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, incorporating prenatal and immediate neonatal factors to analyze the association with neonatal mortality prior to discharge, and a prediction calculator was generated. The performance of ultrasound and that of MRI for the prediction of neonatal mortality were compared. Results Of 253 pregnancies with fetal CDH, 104 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 77 (74%) neonates survived to discharge. Seventy‐five fetuses underwent both prenatal ultrasound and MRI. On multivariable analysis, observed/expected (o/e) lung‐to‐head ratio and o/e total fetal lung volume were associated independently with neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83–0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84–0.97), respectively), whereas liver position was not. There was no significant difference in predictive performance between using ultrasound and MRI together (area under the receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve (AUC), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93)) compared with using ultrasound alone (AUC, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72–0.90); P = 0.19). The addition of neonatal parameters (gestational age at birth and small‐for‐gestational age) did not improve model performance (AUC, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95)) compared with the combined ultrasound and MRI model (P = 0.22). There was poor agreement between severity assessment on ultrasound and MRI (Cohen's κ, 0.19). Most discrepancies were seen among cases deemed to be non‐severe on ultrasound and severe on MRI, and outcomes were more consistent with MRI‐based prognostication. Conclusions In fetuses with prenatally diagnosed isolated LCDH, mortality prediction using standardized ultrasound and MRI measurements performed reasonably well. In cases classified as non‐severe on ultrasound, MRI is recommended, as it may provide more accurate prognostication and assist in the determination of candidacy for fetal intervention. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OC16.07: Prediction of survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia fetuses: which method is better using observed/expected total fetal lung volumes?

EP06.34: O/E LHR at ultrasound versus observed‐to‐expected total fetal lung volume at MR imaging in the prediction of survival in fetuses with left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Can Ultrasonographic Measurement of Respiratory Variability in the Diameter of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Parturients During Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Cohort Study

EP06.73: Assessment of the severity of lung hypoplasia before fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in fetuses affected by congenital diaphragmatic hernia using observed/expected total fetal lung volume

Prediction and probability of neonatal outcome in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia using multiple ultrasound parameters

Prenatal prediction of postnatal survival in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia using MRI: lung volume measurement, signal intensity ratio, and effect of experience

EP06.36: Prenatal predictors of survival and pulmonary hypertension in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing expectant management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The novel fetal MRI O/E CLV versus O/E LHR in predicting prognosis in congenital diaphragmatic hernias: can we teach an old dog new tricks?

EP06.44: Comparing ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting perinatal mortality among fetuses with left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Prenatal prediction of survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: An audit of postnatal outcomes

Comparison of current to past outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia using mri observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume

Predicting neonatal mortality prior to discharge from hospital in prenatally diagnosed left congenital diaphragmatic hernia

OC16.05: The factors influencing clinicians in medical decision making for fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia at a tertiary referral centre

EP06.26: Slice‐to‐volume registration to assess lung volume in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia who underwent fetoscopic enlolunial tracheal occlusion

Fetal pulmonary artery diameter measurements as a predictor of morbidity in antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A prospective study

Ultrasonographic measurement of mediastinal shift angle for the prediction of postnatal survival in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Bias in the prenatal lung measurements in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia with intrauterine growth restriction

The fetal lung-to-liver signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of outcomes from isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia

EP06.25: Fetal ultrasound predictors for early postnatal intervention in congenital pulmonary airway malformations

OP01.09: Ultrasound predictors of abnormal severe neonatal outcomes in late fetal growth restriction

EP06.39: Prenatal contralateral pulmonary artery diameter is the best prediction of the hernia size in congenital diaphragmatic hernia