Neurorestoratology, a Distinct Discipline and a New Era: A Brief Introduction to the First IANR Section
Hongyun Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3727/096368910X492580
2010-02-01
Cell Transplantation
Abstract:We are very happy to announce that the publication of clinic studies, comparison, integration, and the combination of current effective therapies must be carried out the first International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR) section of Cell Transplantation has become and clinical treatment guidelines should be made as fast as possible in order for patients to derive maximum bentrue. This section will be a periodical specialty one dedicated to publishing important advancements in the efit from the achievements and advancements being made in the field of Neurorestoratology. preclinical research and clinical application of neurorestoratology in the future. It will open a window for popuIt puzzles me greatly that many authors still state that there are no therapeutic methods to restore, even parlarizing neurorestoratology—a new distinct discipline— and spreading knowledge and information to enlighten tially, neurological functions for intractable damage or diseases in the CNS within their articles when they demore scientists and clinical physicians on this cuttingedge subject and share the advancements and experience scribe the current situation of this field, but in which they reported some functional restoration by their own in this new field. In 2009, the Beijing Declaration of IANR clearly demethods. I wonder why they fear and deny the achievements of neurorestoratology from others while they state fined Neurorestoratology in detail; the concept, the research and scope, interventional therapies, discipline obachieving positive results. If their statement is true, that is, there are no therapeutic methods to restore, even parjective, developing direction, and the abiding principles (4). From neurorestoration to neurorestoratology, one tially, neurological functions in basic and clinic studies, then we have not made any progress in this field except common word became a special discipline term following the hard work of innumerable scientists and clinical for lessons and the rest would be nonsense. Needless to say, this statement is false and unfair to all scientists and physicians in this field; its birth stems from neuroscientific innovation and its development will involve crossclinical physicians who have dedicated themselves to this field. Even if the advance is limited, should we not pollination with other disciplines and the meeting of specific challenges. highlight and respect these achievements? Moreover, it is a common view in Neurorestoratology and the IANR The core of Neurorestoratology is especially to restore the neurological functions of patients and improve that any small functional gains that have significant effects on a patient’s quality of life should be recognized. their quality of life. We know there are a plethora of inspiring results in basic research which suggest that we Currently, with no doubt, it is an explicit conclusion that structural and functional restoration has been achieved can functionally restore damage to the CNS based on animal models of degenerative diseases and injury. Unto a certain extent in the CNS; however, at present the degree of neurological functional restoration is limited fortunately, the majority of physicians remain ignorant or unaware of these advances and insist on saying that and far below many patients’ higher expectation (3). The randomizing double blind control study is a very there is currently no way to fulfill a patient’s longing for treatment. We should not forget the Declaration of important tool to assess effect in clinical trials. But it is not the only feasible tool; sometimes it even is unavailHelsinki, “in the treatment of a patient, where proven prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic methods do not able for some treatment or studies, such as organ (heart, liver, and kidney) transplantation. It is believed that exist or have been ineffective, the physician, with informed consent from the patient, must be free to use these diseases (heart failure, liver failure, and kidney failure) can only be treated by organ transplantation. In unproven or new prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic measures, if in the physician’s judgement it offers this condition, self-comparison as an assessment method is a much better tool than randomizing double blind conhope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering” (9). Last, but not least, the need for functional trol for ethical, lawful, and scientific reasons. Patients with complete chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) or deterineurorestoration is known by all; the cure is known by none. The cure lies in the future, but the seeds are in our orated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are always told that there is no way and no chance to improve or hands, for us to plant; so translation between basic and