Abstract:Objective To compare the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion(LF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis.Methods From January 2010 to June 2014,54 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis underwent surgical treatment.Among them,29 patients were underwent ACDF,and 25 patients were underwent LF in Department of spine surgery,Tianjin Union Medical Centre.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fusion segments,Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA)score,Neck Disability Index (NDI),Visual Analog Scale (VAS),change of cervical curvature,range of motion (ROM)and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results Mean operative time was (162.7 ± 21.3) min in the anterior approach group versus (176.3 ± 29.8) min in the posterior group(P ＞ 0.05).Mean intraoperative blood loss was (135.6 ± 27.8)ml in the anterior approach group and (255.2 ±32.3)ml in the posterior approach group(P ＜0.05).Mean fusion levels are (4.1 ±0.3)in the anterior approach group and (5.3 ±0.5) in the posterior approach group (P＜0.05).The mean preoperative JOA score were(8.3 ± 2.7)in the anterior approach group and(8.9 ± 2.1) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative JOA score were (13.6 ± 2.5) in the anterior approach group and (14.0 ± 1.7) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean improvement rate was (55.7％ ± 16.3％) in the anterior approach group and (58.3％ ± 15.7％) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean preoperative NDI score were (33.8 ± 11.0) in the anterior approach group and (34.4 ± 8.7) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative NDI score were (16.9 ±7.5) in the anterior approach group and (15.5 ±8.1) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean VAS score were (2.9 ± 1.5) in the anterior approach group and (2.5 ± 1.0)in the posterior approach group before operation(P ＞0.05),they are improved to (1.2 ± 1.2) and (1.2 ±1.3),respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean Cobb angle of the operative site were (-24.3 ± 4.4)° in the anterior approach group and (-22.7 ± 3.7) ° in the posterior approach group before operation (P ＞ 0.05).At final follow-up,the Cobb angle of the operative site were (13.7 ± 3.2)° in the anterior approach group and (6.2 ± 4.2) ° in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.01).Mean preoperative ROM were (29.0 ± 6.7) ° and (30.4 ±5.4)° in the anterior approach group and posterior approach group,respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative ROM were (11.7 ±6.5) ° and (8.2 ± 5.9) °in the anterior approach group and the posterior approach group,respectively(P ＜ 0.05).There were 16 patients with complications in the anterior approach group and 7 patients with complications in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion For multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis,ACDF can restore the lordosis better,fuse less levels but have more complications compared with LF.Patients treated with LF can get as good life quality as with ACDF and have less complications although fuse more levels compared with ACDF.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Sagittal Alignment After Different Levels of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: From One-level to Three-level

Comparison Study of Clinical Outcomes and Sagittal Alignment Improvement Between Anterior and Posterior Fusion Techniques for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Two-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Analysis of Sagittal Balance and Axial Symptoms.

Cervical Spine Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with or Without Plate A Minimal 5-Year Follow-Up of a CONSORT-compliant Article

Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Exploration on Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Minimum of a 5-Year Follow-Up.

A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Corpectomy in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Comparison of Two Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Correlation between axial symptoms and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with two-level or three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervcial discectomy and fusion versus hybird surgery

Cervical sagittal alignment changes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Radiological and clinical outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty

Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4‐level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion in treating two-level adjacent cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion.

Comparative Study Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with ROI-C Cage and Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Without Spinal Stenosis

1076 3-Level ACDF Versus 3-Level Laminectomy and Fusion: Are There Differences in Outcomes? An Analysis of the QOD CSM Cohort

Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study.

Comparison of the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis

Is Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Superior to Corpectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis