PFS to predict long-term OS after first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Correlation and power analysis of randomized trials (RCT).

Michele Milella,Francesco Massari,Francesca La Russa,Francesca Maines,Alessandra Felici,Vanja Vaccaro,Camillo Porta,Sergio Bracarda,Francesco Cognetti,Diana Giannarelli,Giampaolo Tortora,Emilio Bria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4541
IF: 45.3
2012-05-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4541 Background: Targeted agents (TA) have become standard 1st line aRCC treatment based on evidence of PFS advantage. Retrospective series indicatePFS as a reliable intermediate end-point in this setting; however, correlation, surrogacy testing, and validation are required. Methods: RCT evaluating the efficacy of TA as 1st line treatment for aRCC were eligible. PFS/OS Response/Disease Control rates (ORR, DCR) and HR were extracted from papers/updated presentations. Correlations between 6-, 9-, and 12-mo PFS and OS rates according to parametric (Pearson’s r) and non-parametric (Spearman’s Rho and Kendall’s Tau) coefficients (with 95% CI) were analyzed to avoid lead-time biases. Regression analysis (parametric R2) and a power-analysis-model to determine patients’ sample necessary to detect 3%, 5% and 10% OS gain were developed. Results: Six RCT (4096 pts) were gathered. The best overall correlation between PFS and OS at concurrent timepoints was found at 9 mos. With regard to overall rates, 3- and 6-mo PFS significantly correlated with 9-mo OS, as shown in the table below. Pearson’s coefficients for the correlation between 3-mo PFS and 6- and 12-mo OS were 0.70 (p=0.01) and 0.67 (p=0.01); the correlation between 6-mo PFS and 12-mo OS was also significant (Pearson 0.74, p=0.005; Spearman 0.83, p=0.005; Tau 0.71, p=0.001). The regression equation was: Y=0.391861 + 0.4914X [R2 0.44, p(slope)=0.01]; based on this model, the demonstration of a 3-mo PFS absolute difference of 6%, 10% and 21% (corresponding to a 9-mo OS benefit of 3%, 5% and 10%) would require 2043, 696 and 155 patients, respectively. A significant correlation was also found between DCR and OS. Conclusions: Early PFS is an acceptable intermediate end-point for OS in the context of 1st line TA for aRCC. Individual patient data analysis to verify Prentice criteria would be required for definitive confirmation. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?