Comparison of a Head-Mounted Display and a Curved Screen in a Multi-Talker Audiovisual Listening Task

Gerard Llorach,Maartje M. E. Hendrikse,Giso Grimm,Volker Hohmann,Maartje M.E. Hendrikse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.01451
IF: 6.4588
2020-04-03
Human-Computer Interaction
Abstract:Introduction: Virtual audiovisual technology and its methodology has yet to be established for psychoacoustic research. This study examined the effects of different audiovisual conditions on preference when listening to multi-talker conversations. The study's goal is to explore and assess audiovisual technologies in the context of hearing research. Methods: The participants listened to audiovisual conversations between four talkers. Two displays were tested and compared: a curved screen (CS) and a head-mounted display (HMD). Using three visual conditions (audio-only, virtual characters and video recordings), three groups of participants were tested: seventeen young normal-hearing, ten older normal-hearing, and ten older hearing-impaired listeners. Results: Open interviews showed that the CS was preferred over the HMD for older normal-hearing participants and that video recordings were the preferred visual condition. Young and older hearing-impaired participants did not show a preference between the CS and the HMD. Conclusions: CSs and video recordings should be the preferred audiovisual setup of laboratories and clinics, although HMDs and virtual characters can be used for hearing research when necessary and suitable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?