Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

Communication‐Efficient Distributed Estimation of Causal Effects With High‐Dimensional Data

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Robust nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects: A propensity score‐based varying coefficient approach

A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effect

Sufficient dimension reduction for average causal effect estimation

Double-robust and efficient methods for estimating the causal effects of a binary treatment

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models

Learning from Local to Global - an Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Modeling Time-to-event Data

A New Covariate Selection Strategy for High Dimensional Data in Causal Effect Estimation with Multivariate Treatments

Program Evaluation and Causal Inference with High-Dimensional Data

Estimation of Average Treatment Effect Based on a Multi-Index Propensity Score.

High-dimensional model-assisted inference for treatment effects with multi-valued treatments

Debiased Inverse Propensity Score Weighting for Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Confounders

Estimating average treatment effect on the treated via sufficient dimension reduction

Doubly Robust Estimation in Causal Inference with Missing Outcomes: with an Application to the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study

Robust estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using electronic health record data

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choices

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression