Atlas of Gray Matter Volume Differences Across Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review with a Novel Meta-Analysis That Considers Co-Occurring Disorders
Lydia Fortea,Maria Ortuño,Michele De Prisco,Vincenzo Oliva,Anton Albajes-Eizagirre,Adriana Fortea,Santiago Madero,Aleix Solanes,Enric Vilajosana,Yuanwei Yao,Lorenzo Del Fabro,Eduard Solé Galindo,Norma Verdolini,Alvar Farré-Colomés,Maria Serra-Blasco,Maria Picó-Pérez,Steve Lukito,Toby Wise,Christina Carlisi,Danilo Arnone,Matthew Kempton,Alexander Omar Hauson,Scott Wollman,Carles Soriano-Mas,Katya Rubia,Luke Norman,Paolo Fusar-Poli,David Mataix-Cols,Marc Valentí,Esther Via,Narcis Cardoner,Marco Solmi,Jintao Zhang,Pinglei Pan,Jae Il Shin,Miquel Àngel Fullana,Eduard Vieta,Joaquim Radua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.020
IF: 12.81
2024-01-01
Biological Psychiatry
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Regional gray matter volume (GMV) differences between individuals with mental disorders and comparison subjects may be confounded by co-occurring disorders. To disentangle the disorder-specific GMV correlates, we conducted a large-scale multi-disorder meta-analysis using a novel approach that explicitly models co-occurring disorders. METHODS:We systematically reviewed voxel-based morphometry studies indexed in PubMed and Scopus up to January 2023 comparing adults with major mental disorders (anorexia nervosa, schizophrenia-spectrum, anxiety, bipolar, major depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and post-traumatic stress disorders, plus attention-deficit/hyperactivity, autism spectrum, and borderline personality disorders) to comparison subjects. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We derived GMV correlates for each disorder using: a) a multi-disorder meta-analysis accounting for all co-occurring mental disorders simultaneously; b) separate standard meta-analyses for each disorder ignoring co-occurring disorders. We assessed the alterations' extent, intensity (effect size), and specificity (inter-disorder correlations and transdiagnostic alterations) for both approaches. RESULTS:We included 433 studies (499 datasets) involving 19,718 patients and 16,441 comparison subjects (51% females, aged 20-67 years). We provide GMV correlate maps for each disorder using both approaches. The novel approach, which accounted for co-occurring disorders, produced GMV correlates that were more focal and disorder-specific (less correlated across disorders and fewer transdiagnostic abnormalities). CONCLUSIONS:This work offers the most comprehensive atlas of GMV correlates across major mental disorders. Modeling co-occurring disorders yielded more specific correlates, supporting this approach's validity. The atlas NIfTI maps are available online.