Outcomes of Follow-up Imaging After Pediatric Spinal Trauma Confirmed With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Aapo Sirén,Johanna Syvänen,Mikko Nyman,Kimmo Mattila,Jussi Hirvonen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000002615
2024-03-08
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Abstract:Pediatric spinal trauma is uncommon. Spinal fractures are estimated to represent 1% to 3% of all pediatric fractures, 1 and in a large Finnish registry-based study, the annual incidence of spinal trauma requiring hospitalization was 1 per 15,000 children. 2 The exact incidence of spinal trauma without needing surgical care is unknown in the pediatric population. Because spinal injuries are rare but potentially fatal, the most suitable primary imaging method is still under discussion. The role of imaging is to detect potentially unstable injuries demanding surgery or brace immobilization. The most common potentially unstable injuries include posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) or anterior tension band injury, burst fractures, and disruption of the ligaments stabilizing the occipitocervical junction. 3,4 Conventional radiographs and computed tomography (CT) are widely recommended for first-line imaging, 3,5 but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive. 6–8 Important stabilizing ligaments of the spine are usually not visible on CT or conventional radiographs. Potential injuries in these structures must be assessed with secondary findings on bony structures, such as avulsion fractures and vertebral misalignment. MRI is superior in visualizing the ligaments and comparable to CT in detecting bony injuries. 9,10 A recent retrospective analysis found MRI safe and 100% sensitive for unstable injuries in the pediatric population with suspected cervical spine trauma. 11 The most significant drawbacks of the MRI include the need for anesthesia in younger or restless children, higher cost per examination, and longer scanning time compared with CT or conventional radiographs. Despite the higher sensitivity in ligamentous injuries, MRI does not necessarily yield additional value in the treatment of pediatric spinal trauma, 12–14 but its major advantage over CT is the lack of ionizing radiation.
pediatrics,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?