Abstract:The origin, nature and timing of prehistoric human activity on the Tibetan Plateau has become a major research topic in recent years, and great progress has been made in the study of the earliest human activity on the plateau and in the origin of modern Tibetans. The earliest human presence on the plateau has been updated by two important new studies. Rich blade assemblages found in the excavation of the Nwya Devu site shows that modern humans occupied the interior region of the Tibetan Plateau, above 4600 m a.s.l., some 30−40 thousand years ago. Recently, a study of a human mandible fossil found in Xiahe County, Gansu Province, in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, indicated that Denisovans occupied the Tibetan Plateau at least 160000 years ago, much earlier than the arrival of modern humans to the region. The latter study also implies that the high-altitude adaptation gene, which occurs widely among modern Tibetans and Sherpa, was probably contributed by local archaic humans, like the Xiahe Denisovans. These two studies not only point to the long and complex human history in the Tibetan Plateau, but they also indicate the complexity of human evolution in the Middle and Late Pleistocene in East Asia. Whether early Holocene hunter-gatherers had already permanently settled on the Tibetan Plateau before the arrival of millet and barley agriculture after the middle Holocene, has become another major research topic in the study of the prehistoric human history of the Tibetan Plateau. However, due to the current lack of reliable evidence for the seasonality of Paleolithic site occupations in the Tibetan Plateau, the issue remains difficult to resolve.The origin of modern Tibetans has been debated for decades. A new linguistic study of the phylogeny and the time depth of the original divergence of the Sino-Tibetan language, based on Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of 109 languages, indicates that Sino-Tibetan languages diverged during some 4200 to 7800 years ago, which points to Neolithic population dispersals to the Tibetan Plateau and their close relationship with modern Tibetans. In addition, a new genetic study, based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analyses of 8277 Tibetans and 58514 individuals from the surrounding populations, has traced the genetic legacy of modern Tibetans to the historical or even Neolithic periods. Calculation of the time depth of the two common haplogroups in modern Tibetans found in this study, implies that these two groups of populations originated in northern China between 6000 and 10000 years ago and differentiated between 4000 and 5200 years ago. Both of these studies are consistent with previous archaeological studies which propose that Neolithic and Bronze Age populations moved to the Tibetan Plateau from a substantial considerable of areas in North China. More importantly, the two studies further confirm the close relationships between Neolithic millet farmers and modern Tibetans, clarifying the origin of modern Tibetans.There have also been several new Paleolithic archaeological studies of the regions surrounding the Tibetan Plateau. A deeper understanding of the Initial Upper Paleolithic in North China, Mongolia and Siberia, and new findings of the Levallois technology in the Jinsitai and Tongtian cave sites in North China, indicate a dispersal route of Paleolithic populations from the north to the Tibetan Plateau. Other studies also propose possible population migration routes in the southeastern and southwestern plateau, although archaeological evidence is currently lacking. Together with the new Paleolithic archaeological findings for the Tibetan Plateau, it appears that different human groups, including Denisovans, Neanderthals and modern humans, were living in or around the Tibetan Plateau during the Middle to Late Pleistocene. Although recent studies provide new clues for understanding their inter-relationships, additional questions have arisen, and more multidisciplinary studies are needed in the future to address them.Above all, these new studies are crucial for understanding the mechanisms by which prehistoric humans spread to and in the Tibetan Plateau, and their adaptation to the high elevation environments. In addition, they shed new light on the origin of modern humans, as well as on human evolution in East Asia during the Middle and Late Pleistocene.

Initial Upper Paleolithic in the Zagros Mountains

The Initial Upper Paleolithic and Its Place Within the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic Transition of Southwest Asia: What Hides Behind the Curtain of Taxonomies?

A Complex of Stratifi ed Upper Paleolithic Sites in the Foothills of the Northern Tien Shan: General Data and Research Perspectives

High-resolution, multi-proxy reconstruction of central Zagros paleoclimate and paleoenvironment from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene

The Persian plateau served as hub for Homo sapiens after the main out of Africa dispersal

Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)

Pre-Permian uplift and diffuse extensional deformation in the High Zagros Belt (Iran): integration in the geodynamic evolution of the Arabian plate

The Concepts, Chronology and Dispersal Routes of the Initial Upper Paleolithic of South Siberia and Central Asia

Reconstructing contact and a potential interbreeding geographical zone between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans

A Bayesian luminescence chronology for the Bawa Yawan Rock Shelter at the Central Zagros Mountains (Western Iran)

Early humans migration and adaptation in the Palaeolithic Tibetan Plateau

An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China

Initial Upper Palaeolithic Material Culture by 45,000 Years Ago at Shiyu in Northern China

New advances in the study of prehistoric human activity on the Tibetan Plateau

The Early Neolithic of Iraqi Kurdistan: Current research at Bestansur, Shahrizor Plain

Lithic Technology and Chronology of Initial Upper Paleolithic Assemblages at Tor Fawaz, Southern Jordan

The Chinese Upper Paleolithic: Geography, Chronology, and Techno-typology

Early Neolithic genomes from the eastern Fertile Crescent

The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Central and East Asia: Blade Technology, Cultural Transmission, and Implications for Human Dispersals

The earliest human occupation of the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 thousand to 30 thousand years ago

Reply to: An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China