Abstract:Key PointsQuestionAmong patients with ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion and eligible for thrombolysis, is endovascular treatment alone noninferior to intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment with regard to functional independence? FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial that included 234 patients with acute ischemic stroke, the proportion who achieved functional independence at 90 days was 54.3% in the endovascular treatment alone group vs 46.6% in the intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment group, a difference that met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 10%. MeaningAmong patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion and eligible for thrombolysis, endovascular treatment alone, compared with intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment, met the prespecified statistical threshold for noninferiority for the outcome of 90-day functional independence, although the clinical acceptability of the threshold for noninferiority should be considered when interpreting the results. ImportanceFor patients with large vessel occlusion strokes, it is unknown whether endovascular treatment alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (standard treatment) can achieve similar functional outcomes. ObjectiveTo investigate whether endovascular thrombectomy alone is noninferior to intravenous alteplase followed by endovascular thrombectomy for achieving functional independence at 90 days among patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, randomized, noninferiority trial conducted at 33 stroke centers in China. Patients (n=234) were 18 years or older with proximal anterior circulation intracranial occlusion strokes within 4.5 hours from symptoms onset and eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. Enrollment took place from May 20, 2018, to May 2, 2020. Patients were enrolled and followed up for 90 days (final follow-up was July 22, 2020). InterventionsA total of 116 patients were randomized to the endovascular thrombectomy alone group and 118 patients to combined intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy group. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving functional independence at 90 days (defined as score 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale; range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The noninferiority margin was -10%. Safety outcomes included the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 hours and 90-day mortality. ResultsThe trial was stopped early because of efficacy when 234 of a planned 970 patients had undergone randomization. All 234 patients who were randomized (mean age, 68 years; 102 women [43.6%]) completed the trial. At the 90-day follow-up, 63 patients (54.3%) in the endovascular thrombectomy alone group vs 55 (46.6%) in the combined treatment group achieved functional independence at the 90-day follow-up (difference, 7.7%, 1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.1% to infinity )P for noninferiority=.003). No significant between-group differences were detected in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (6.1% vs 6.8%; difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -7.1% to 5.6%) and 90-day mortality (17.2% vs 17.8%; difference, -0.5%; 95% CI, -10.3% to 9.2%). Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with ischemic stroke due to proximal anterior circulation occlusion within 4.5 hours from onset, endovascular treatment alone, compared with intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment, met the prespecified statistical threshold for noninferiority for the outcome of 90-day functional independence. These findings should be interpreted in the context of the clinical acceptability of the selected noninferiority threshold. Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 This noninferiority trial compares the effects of endovascular treatment with vs without intravenous alteplase on 90-day functional independence among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Systemic THrombolysis Randomization IN Endovascular Stroke Therapy (SHRINE) Collaboration: a patient-level pooled analysis of the SKIP and DEVT Trials

Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

Effect of Baseline Infarct Size on Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Stroke Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial (DIRECT-MT).

Exploring the Relationship Between Ischemic Core Volume and Clinical Outcomes after Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis

Effect of Bleeding Risk Prediction on Decision Making of Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy: a Subgroup Analysis of DIRECT-MT.

Endovascular Treatment for Minor Acute Ischemic Strokes with Large Vessel Occlusion

Abstract 44: DEVT: Endovascular Treatment Alone versus Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment in Stroke

Abstract 100: Endovascular Treatment With Intravenous Tirofiban Or Alteplase Versus Endovascular Treatment Alone For Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis Of The Devt And Rescue Bt Trials

Endovascular Treatment or General Treatment: How Should Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Choose to Benefit from Them the Most?

Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone Vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: the DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abstract TP189: Outcome Differences Between Endovascular Thrombectomy and Medical Management Based on Underlying Stroke Etiology: A Secondary Analysis of SELECT2 Trial

Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials

Endovascular Treatment Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Quantitative Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Randomized Trials

Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment in patients with established large infarct: a cohort study

Endovascular Thrombectomy or Bridging Therapy in Minor Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion

Endovascular Treatment With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Tandem Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: the RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Association of Functional Outcomes Between Intravenous Tirofiban and Endovascular Thrombectomy in Imaging-Screened Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: a Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke

Bridging therapy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy in patients with established large infarct: a prospective cohort study