Abstract:ObjectiveTo assess the correlation between Z‐scores of positive NIPT results and the positive predictive value (PPV) of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). MethodsPregnancies with positive NIPT results at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre between July 2017 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal NIPT results for confirmatory testing. Logistic regression analyses was applied to study the relationship between the Z scores and the PPV performance. The optimal cut‐off values for indicating fetal common trisomies were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and then the PPV were calculated in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z‐score greater than or equal to cut‐off value and in patients with a Z‐score between 3 and cut‐off value respectively. ResultsA total of 214 pregnancies with positive NIPT results for fetal common trisomies were validated by invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow up in this study. Of these, NIPT indicated trisomy 13 in 25 cases, trisomy 18 in 54 cases and trisomy 21 in 135 patients. Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (P<0.05) between the Z‐scores and true positive results for T21 and T18. For T13, the significant association was not observed (P>0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut‐off Z‐score for indicating fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 were 6.889, 7.574 and 6.612 respectively, and the corresponding area under curve were 0.706, 0.916 and 0.954. In this cohort with abnormal NIPT results, the cut‐off values revealed a sensitivity of 96.8% and a specificity of 90% for indicating trisomies 21, and a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 92.6% for trisomies 18. However, probably due to the sample size, the sensitivity and specificity for indicating trisomy 13 were lower (85.7% and 61.1%) than that for trisomies 21 and 18. The positive predictive values in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z‐score greater than or equal to cut‐off value were 99.18% (121/122) for trisomy 21, 92.31% (24/26) for trisomy 18 and 46.15% (6/13) for trisomy 13. In patients with a Z‐score between 3 and cut‐off Z‐score, the PPV of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 were 30.77% (4/13), 10.71% (3/28) and 8.33% (1/12) respectively. Moreover, by classifying Z scores as 3≤Z<5, 5≤Z<10, and Z≥10, the majority of Z scores were above 10 with a PPV of 99% for T21 and just 5.2% were between 3 and 5 with a PPV of 14.3%. In contrast for T18, over a third of tests had Z scores between 3 and 5. The PPV in this group is just over 5%. ConclusionsThe present results show that the PPV performance of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 are closely associated with Z‐score. The higher the Z‐score, the greater the likelihood that the aneuploidy result is correct. Our experience in evaluating the Z‐score accuracy of NIPT in this study could be of use in similar work.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the performance of NIPT and NIPT‐plus for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and high Z‐score increases the positive predictive value

Clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13: a hospital experience.

Expanding the Scope of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing to Detect Fetal Chromosomal Copy Number Variations

Evaluation of the Z‐score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18 and 21 at a single center

The Application of NIPT Using Combinatorial Probe-Anchor Synthesis to Identify Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies (scas) in a Cohort of 570 Pregnancies

Combining Z-Score and Maternal Copy Number Variation Analysis Increases the Positive Rate and Accuracy in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

[Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with high risks by screening of fetal free DNA from peripheral blood samples]

Discordant performances of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal trisomy 21 screening in subgroups of pregnancies

[The value of non-invasive prenatal testing for the identification of numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in the fetuses]

Combined fetal fraction to analyze the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21

[Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Twin Pregnancy: an Analysis of 2057 Cases].

Non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 and sex chromosome aneuploidies in 68,763 cases

Efficiency of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing in the detection of fetal subchromosomal microdeletion and microduplication in a cohort of 31,256 single pregnancies

Non-invasive prenatal testing for the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities: Insights from a large multicenter study in southern China

Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies

The accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing in a consecutive series of 20,626 pregnancies with different clinical characteristics

An assessment of the analytical performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies: 34,717-patient sample in a single prenatal diagnosis Centre in China

Cell-Free DNA Screening for Sex Chromosome Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes, 2018–2020: A Retrospective Analysis

The performance evaluation of NIPT for fetal chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection: a retrospective analysis of 68,588 Chinese cases

Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18 and 13: Clinical Experience from 146,958 Pregnancies.

[Analysis of the results of chromosomal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 screening among 40 628 women by non-invasive prenatal testing]