Abstract:In this essay I propose two different but complementary models with which to think about the relation between the novel and the historical process of globalization. The first—the globalization of the novel—works not with particular textual formations, but with the historical expansion of the novel form hand-in-hand with the colonial enterprise of Western Europe. With this interpretative concept, I review the historical and theoretical parameters that have been used to study both the historical spread of the novel from Europe to the peripheries and the constitution, at the end of the nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, of a global system of production, reception, and translation of novels. The second model—the novelization of the global—focuses on the production of images of a globalized world as they are constructed in specific novels. My examples are novels by Jules Verne and Eduardo Ladislao Holmberg. While both writers create images of travelers spreading modern bourgeois culture throughout the world and beyond, as might be expected, Verne's images differ significantly from Holmberg's. My claim here is that the particular geopolitical determinations that marked each of these writers produced dissimilar imaginaries of the global reach of their bourgeois characters and plots. Finally, in a coda to this double hypothesis, I connect the interpretative models of the globalization of the novel and the novelization of the global with the rentrée of the concept of world literature. Recently re-introduced to academic debate by Franco Moretti, Pascale Casanova, and David Damrosch, among others, this restored notion of world literature can be understood as an attempt to conceptualize the global ubiquity of the novel since the mid-twentieth century. Here I analyze what could be called the cultural politics of world literature and the critical and pedagogical practices that are derived from this concept. I also examine its underlying claim to address, in academic practices, cosmopolitan expectations related to the production of a discourse about the world based on respect for cultural difference. In other words, my question is whether world literature, as a concept and as a practice, is capable of becoming an effective cosmopolitan discourse.

What is the Concept of Globalization Good for? An African Historian's Perspective

History and Globalization: Reflections on Temporality

A Critical Examination of Globalization's Impact on the Economies of Sub-Saharan African Countries

Do We Really Need a "Global View of History"?

Three Concepts of Globalization

Globalization Theory: A Post Mortem

The Two Faces of Globalization: Against Globalization as We Know It

Globalization, governance, and Administrative Culture

On the historicity of the development and evolution of the concept of globalization

Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization

Globalization in Lifelong Gender Inclusive Education for Structural Transformation in Africa

Globalization and China:from "Challenge-response" to "Response-innovation"

Globalization versus the state: false antinomy or logical fallacy? A response to Clyde W. Barrow and Michelle Keck

The Globalization of the Novel and the Novelization of the Global. A Critique of World Literature

Globalization: Myths and Realities1

What Globalization Overshadows

Globalization and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research

Globalization and Folk Theory of Social Change: How Globalization Relates to Societal Perceptions about the Past and Future

Do Western Sociological Concepts Apply Globally? Towards a Global Sociology

“Decolonisation” and “Africanisation” of Knowledge: Politico-Ideological or Educational Concepts?

Integrating Africa to Global Economy: Seeking a Trilateral Partnership of Sino-US and European Union