Referred molecular testing as a barrier to optimal treatment decision making in metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer: Experience at a tertiary academic institution in Canada

Grace K. Grafham,Kenneth J. Craddock,Weei‐Yuarn Huang,Alexander V. Louie,Liying Zhang,David M. Hwang,Ambica Parmar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6886
IF: 4.711
2024-02-07
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Timely biomarker testing enables efficient initiation of optimal targeted treatments in metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients. We retrospectively compared time to treatment decision between mNSCLC patients with biomarkers tested in‐house (n = 73) and those sent‐out to an external laboratory (n = 92). We found that in‐house testing significantly decreased treatment decision times, resulting in a reduction in missed/suboptimal treatment opportunities. Background Molecular testing is critical to guiding treatment approaches in patients with metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), with testing delays adversely impacting the timeliness of treatment decisions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the time from initial mNSCLC diagnosis to treatment decision (TTD) following implementation of in‐house EGFR, ALK, and PD‐L1 testing at our institution. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 165 patients (send‐out testing, n = 92; in‐house testing, n = 73) with newly diagnosed mNSCLC treated at our institution. Data were compared during the send‐out (March 2017–May 2019) and in‐house (July 2019–March 2021) testing periods. We performed a detailed workflow analysis to provide insight on the pre‐analytic, analytic, and post‐analytic intervals that constituted the total TTD. Results TTD was significantly shorter with in‐house testing (10 days vs. 18 days, p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?