Abstract:Abstract Background Wildfire smoke contributes substantially to the global disease burden and is a major cause of air pollution in the US states of Oregon and Washington. Climate change is expected to bring more wildfires to this region. Social media is a popular platform for health promotion and a need exists for effective communication about smoke risks and mitigation measures to educate citizens and safeguard public health. Methods Using a sample of 1,287 Tweets from 2022, we aimed to analyze temporal Tweeting patterns in relation to potential smoke exposure and evaluate and compare institutions’ use of social media communication best practices which include (i) encouraging adoption of smoke-protective actions; (ii) leveraging numeric, verbal, and Air Quality Index risk information; and (iii) promoting community-building. Tweets were characterized using keyword searches and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out. Results 44% of Tweets in our sample were authored between January-August 2022, prior to peak wildfire smoke levels, whereas 54% of Tweets were authored during the two-month peak in smoke (September-October). Institutional accounts used Twitter (or X) to encourage the adoption of smoke-related protective actions (82% of Tweets), more than they used it to disseminate wildfire smoke risk information (25%) or promote community-building (47%). Only 10% of Tweets discussed populations vulnerable to wildfire smoke health effects, and 14% mentioned smoke mitigation measures. Tweets from Washington-based accounts used significantly more verbal and numeric risk information to discuss wildfire smoke than Oregon-based accounts ( p = 0.042 and p = 0.003, respectively); however, Tweets from Oregon-based accounts on average contained a higher percentage of words associated with community-building language ( p < 0.001). Conclusions This research provides practical recommendations for public health practitioners and researchers communicating wildfire smoke risks on social media. As exposures to wildfire smoke rise due to climate change, reducing the environmental disease burden requires health officials to leverage popular communication platforms, distribute necessary health-related messaging rapidly, and get the message right. Timely, evidence-based, and theory-driven messaging is critical for educating and empowering individuals to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from harmful exposures. Thus, proactive and sustained communications about wildfire smoke should be prioritized even during wildfire “off-seasons.”

Burning Through Information: An Investigation of Information Sources and Information Seeking Behavior During 2020 Oregon Wildfires

Wildfires and social media discourse: exploring mental health and emotional wellbeing through Twitter

Clearing the air: evaluating institutions’ social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest

Investigating disaster response for resilient communities through social media data and the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model: A case study of 2020 Western U.S. wildfire season

Investigating disaster response through social media data and the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model: A case study of 2020 Western U.S. wildfire season

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Media for Wildfire Information Dissemination under Multiple Scenarios in Eight Provinces of China

Health and social impacts of California wildfires and the deficiencies in current recovery resources: An exploratory qualitative study of systems-level issues

How the experience of California wildfires shape Twitter climate change framings

Five social and ethical considerations for using wildfire visualizations as a communication tool

Wildfires and Climate Change: What does social media tell us on linkages and public understanding? (Preliminary White Paper, February 11, 2022)

Cultural Theory, Wildfire Information Source, and Agency Public Trust: A Central Oregon Case Study

Analyzing and Leveraging Social Media Disaster Communication of Natural Hazards: Community Sentiment and Messaging Regarding the Australian 2019/20 Bushfires

Measuring mental health outcomes in Walbridge Fire 2020

Community-based Behavioral Understanding of Crisis Activity Concerns using Social Media Data: A Study on the 2023 Canadian Wildfires in New York City

Quantifying wildland fire resources deployed during the compound threat of COVID-19

Trends in bushfire related tweets during the Australian ‘Black Summer’ of 2019/20

Social media usage patterns during natural hazards

Lessons Learned From the 2018 Attica Wildfire: Households' Expectations of Evacuation Logistics and Evacuation Time Estimate Components

Mitigating wildfire smoke inside homes: Evidence from Oregon, September 2020

Social Vulnerabilities and Wildfire Evacuations: A Case Study of the 2019 Kincade Fire

Breathing on the job: investigating predictors of air quality protective actions and information seeking among outdoor workers