Abstract:Rapid increase of seismic data poses challenges to seismic data processing, in which phase-picking is a crucial procedure and accordingly attracts attention from seismologists. Among the breakthroughs in deep learning methods for seismic data processing, seismologists have especially proposed many seismic phase-picking methods based on deep learning, which have shown much better accuracy than traditional automatic phase-picking methods. However, further improvements are needed to meet the requirements for processing continuous seismic records. Here we propose a new approach combining seismic array scheme and U-Net, an end-to-end neural network developed in image segmentation. Previous studies have shown that U-Net can classify waveforms and determine the onset of seismic phases accurately with the help of contracting and expanding paths. Based on U-Net, we first design a deep learning phase picker (PP) model with a long (40 s) time window. To avoid difficulties in time window selection and interference between P- and S-phase identifications, the model involves two networks with the same structure, which pick the P and S phases separately. To improve model training, we employ data transformation to expand the sample set, add typical noises to the sample set for better resemblance of real data, and slightly increase the weight of the seismic signal containing seismic records for a better balance between precision and recall. We also adopt a more effective array-assisted phase picker (APP) model which correlates the picking results from different stations to minimize misidentification. Using data from Hi-net and Alibaba Aftershock AI Capture Contest, we design training and test sets of different sizes to examine the performance and generalization ability of the model. Results show that the APP can effectively pick the body-wave phases on continuous records with a good generalization ability. The relationship between the model performance and training set is such that the model performance is directly related to the data quality rather than the size of the training set, and there is no serious overfitting even for a small training set. Statistics further show that the model has no special requirements for the locations of time windows and can handle seismic records with large epicentral distances. By comparison with other models (model with short time windows or the one of simultaneous picking of P- and S-phases), we find that APP can successfully process event-crowded waveform data and effectively reduce the influence of noise. Finally, we apply the trained model to a seismic network in the Inner Mongolia. Results show that the number of earthquakes detected by the APP is 30 times the manually-detected one, and that 98.1% of the events in the catalog are detected by the APP. The successful application to a seismic network different from the training set suggests that the APP is robust and has strong generalization ability.

Transfer Learning for Seismic Phase Picking With Significantly Higher Precision in Faraway Seismic Stations

Using a Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning to Bridge Scales for Seismic Phase Picking

Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking

Domain Adaptation in Automatic Picking of Phase Velocity Dispersions Based on Deep Learning

Near Real‐Time Earthquake Monitoring in Texas Using the Highly Precise Deep Learning Phase Picker

Phase arrival picking for bridging multi-source downhole microseismic data using deep transfer learning

EQCCT: A Production-Ready Earthquake Detection and Phase-Picking Method Using the Compact Convolutional Transformer

SCALODEEP: A Highly Generalized Deep Learning Framework for Real‐Time Earthquake Detection

An End-to-End Earthquake Detection Method for Joint Phase Picking and Association using Deep Learning

Thousands of Induced Earthquakes Per Month in West Texas Detected Using EQCCT

EdgePhase: A Deep Learning Model for Multi‐station Seismic Phase Picking

Deep Learning-based Small Magnitude Earthquake Detection and Seismic Phase Classification

OBSTransformer: a deep-learning seismic phase picker for OBS data using automated labelling and transfer learning

Deep‐Learning‐Based Phase Picking for Volcano‐Tectonic and Long‐Period Earthquakes

An Array-Assisted Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase-Picking

Toward Fully Autonomous Seismic Networks: Backprojecting Deep Learning-Based Phase Time Functions for Earthquake Monitoring on Continuous Recordings

A Practical Approach to Automatic Earthquake Catalog Compilation in Local OBS Networks Using Deep-Learning and Network-Based Algorithms

Phase Neural Operator for Multi-Station Picking of Seismic Arrivals

Real-time Earthquake Monitoring using Deep Learning: a case study on Turkey Earthquake Aftershock Sequence

Seismic arrival-time picking on distributed acoustic sensing data using semi-supervised learning