Abstract:Introduction: Despite the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology over the last decade, clinician, patient, and public perceptions of its use in healthcare raise a number of ethical, legal and social questions. We systematically review the literature on attitudes towards the use of AI in healthcare from patients, the general public and health professionals' perspectives to understand these issues from multiple perspectives. Methodology: A search for original research articles using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods published between 1 Jan 2001 to 24 Aug 2021 was conducted on six bibliographic databases. Data were extracted and classified into different themes representing views on: (i) knowledge and familiarity of AI, (ii) AI benefits, risks, and challenges, (iii) AI acceptability, (iv) AI development, (v) AI implementation, (vi) AI regulations, and (vii) Human - AI relationship. Results: The final search identified 7,490 different records of which 105 publications were selected based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. While the majority of patients, the general public and health professionals generally had a positive attitude towards the use of AI in healthcare, all groups indicated some perceived risks and challenges. Commonly perceived risks included data privacy; reduced professional autonomy; algorithmic bias; healthcare inequities; and greater burnout to acquire AI-related skills. While patients had mixed opinions on whether healthcare workers suffer from job loss due to the use of AI, health professionals strongly indicated that AI would not be able to completely replace them in their professions. Both groups shared similar doubts about AI's ability to deliver empathic care. The need for AI validation, transparency, explainability, and patient and clinical involvement in the development of AI was emphasised. To help successfully implement AI in health care, most participants envisioned that an investment in training and education campaigns was necessary, especially for health professionals. Lack of familiarity, lack of trust, and regulatory uncertainties were identified as factors hindering AI implementation. Regarding AI regulations, key themes included data access and data privacy. While the general public and patients exhibited a willingness to share anonymised data for AI development, there remained concerns about sharing data with insurance or technology companies. One key domain under this theme was the question of who should be held accountable in the case of adverse events arising from using AI. Conclusions: While overall positivity persists in attitudes and preferences toward AI use in healthcare, some prevalent problems require more attention. There is a need to go beyond addressing algorithm-related issues to look at the translation of legislation and guidelines into practice to ensure fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in AI.

Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine

A plea for caution and guidance about using AI in genomics

Artificial Intelligence, Physiological Genomics, and Precision Medicine.

Artificial intelligence-driven biomedical genomics

Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives

Artificial intelligence in genetic services delivery: Utopia or apocalypse?

Translation of Genomics into Precision Medicine with Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review on Applications, Challenges and Future Perspectives

AI/ML in Precision Medicine: A Look Beyond the Hype

Enabling the clinical application of artificial intelligence in genomics: a perspective of the AMIA Genomics and Translational Bioinformatics Workgroup

Public perceptions on the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Artificial Intelligence and Its Role In The Development Of Personalized Medicine And Drug Control

Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis

Identifying Aspects of Public Attitudes Toward Whole Genome Sequencing to Inform the Integration of Genomics into Care

Artificial Intelligence and the Weaponization of Genetic Data

Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care

Cancer cytogenetics in the era of artificial intelligence: shaping the future of chromosome analysis

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Facial Image Analysis for the Early Detection of Rare Diseases: Legal, Ethical, Forensic, and Cybersecurity Considerations

Advancing public health genomics

Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Biomedicine

The impact and future of artificial intelligence in medical genetics and molecular medicine: an ongoing revolution

Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare from the perspective of digital media: Applications, opportunities and challenges