Differences of prediction performances by multigene assays in patients with breast cancer with distinct genetic backgrounds.

Fei Xing,Ting-Hao Chen,Huimin Wang,Xuejiao Ma,Ran Ding,Zhongyu Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.526
IF: 45.3
2023-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:526 Background: The 21-gene (Oncotype Dx), PAM50 (Prosigna) and Chinese-based 28-gene (RecurIndex) are validated genomic assays that provide prognostic information for distant recurrence risk in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC). In this study, we aim to compare the differences in prediction performance by different multigene assays and gene expression profiles between the Eastern and the Western. Methods: Under the Affymetrix U133 platforms, the differences in gene expressions and risk scores from the Eastern population comprised of GSE20685 (n = 327) and part of GSE45255 (n = 95), and the Western population GSE25066 (n = 508) and the European in GSE45255(n = 44) were analyzed respectively. Patients were stratified by 21-gene Recurrence Scores (RS) of low (0-10), intermediate (11-25) and high (26-100) and categorized by ROR-S score of PAM50 of low (0-40), intermediate (41-60) and high (61-100). For 28-gene, a recurrence index for distant recurrence (RI-DR) cutoff of 33 was used to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups. Wilcoxon rank test was used to test for continuous variables and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Results: The Western population has significantly higher RS (85.9 vs. 65.5, p < 0.001) and ROR-S (57.4 vs.53.7, p = 0.034) scores than the Eastern population. The distribution of 28-gene risk groups was significantly different between races with a higher proportion of high-risk in the Western (10.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.035). The low-risk patients in the Eastern stratified by 28-gene assay had significantly higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates than high-risk (80% vs. 52%, p < 0.001), which compared with Oncotype Dx RS (96% vs. 76%, p < 0.001) and PAM50 ROR-S (93% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). At the same time, the analysis of gene expressions revealed significantly high expressions of YWHAB, SF3B5, CKAP5, and DDX39A in the Eastern than that in the Western. However, most genes from 21-gene and ROR-S were more highly expressed in the Western than that in the Eastern. Conclusions: 21-gene and PAM50 provide the good performance and show similar patterns in the prognosis of EBC; However, the DMFS rate of the high-risk in the Eastern population determined by 28-gene was much lower than 21-gene and PAM50, which means there are bigger chemo-benefit in the high-risk from 28-gene. In conclusion, 28-gene has better performance in the prognosis of the Eastern population and is a more suitable tool for Eastern breast cancer patients.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?