Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) presents a formidable challenge in artificial intelligence, demanding intricate comprehension of legal texts, nuanced interpretation of statutes, and complex reasoning over multifaceted case elements. While recent advancements in natural language processing have shown promise, existing approaches often struggle to capture the sophisticated interplay between facts, legal principles, and precedents that characterize legal decision-making. This paper introduces LegalReasoner, a novel multi-stage framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and integrates domain-specific knowledge for enhanced legal judgment prediction. Our approach encompasses four key stages: 1) legal knowledge infusion, where we pre-train an LLM on a vast corpus of legal literature using contrastive learning techniques; 2) case-law retrieval, employing a graph neural network to identify relevant precedents and statutes; 3) multi-hop reasoning, utilizing a transformer-based architecture with a hierarchical attention mechanism to navigate complex legal arguments; and 4) judgment synthesis, where we employ a generative adversarial network to produce coherent and legally sound judgments. We evaluate LegalReasoner on two diverse datasets: the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) cases and the Chinese AI and Law Challenge (CAIL2018). Our framework demonstrates substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average accuracy increase of 7.8% across all datasets. Furthermore, we conduct extensive ablation studies and interpretability analyses to elucidate the contributions of each component and provide insights into the model's decision-making process. Our work not only advances the field of automated legal reasoning but also offers a transparent and explainable system that could serve as a valuable tool for legal professionals. By bridging the gap between AI and legal expertise, LegalReasoner paves the way for more efficient, consistent, and fair legal decision-making processes.

BERT-CNN based evidence retrieval and aggregation for Chinese legal multi-choice question answering

A Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering Model Based on BERT and Attention.

A Multi-Task Learning Approach for Answer Selection: A Study and a Chinese Law Dataset

A BERT-Based Two-Stage Ranking Method for Legal Case Retrieval

Multi-Task CNN for Classification of Chinese Legal Questions

Progressive Evidence Refinement for Open-domain Multimodal Retrieval Question Answering

Answer Retrieval in Legal Community Question Answering

CaseGNN: Graph Neural Networks for Legal Case Retrieval with Text-Attributed Graphs

BERT_LF: A Similar Case Retrieval Method Based on Legal Facts

KS-LLM: Knowledge Selection of Large Language Models with Evidence Document for Question Answering

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Boosting legal case retrieval by query content selection with large language models

Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval

LeDQA: A Chinese Legal Case Document-based Question Answering Dataset

Experimenting with Legal AI Solutions: The Case of Question-Answering for Access to Justice

BERT-PLI: Modeling Paragraph-Level Interactions for Legal Case Retrieval

LawLuo: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Multi-Round Chinese Legal Consultation

Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

An Entailment Tree Generation Approach for Multimodal Multi-Hop Question Answering with Mixture-of-Experts and Iterative Feedback Mechanism

Leveraging Event Schema to Ask Clarifying Questions for Conversational Legal Case Retrieval