Radiologic-Histopathologic correlation of Fatty Island Sign with Fat Necrosis in Atypical Lipomatous Tumor and Lipoma

Masaya Kawaguchi,Hiroki Kato,Kazuhiro Kobayashi,Tatsuhiko Miyazaki,Akihito Nagano,Yoshifumi Noda,Fuminori Hyodo,Masayuki Matsuo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.009
IF: 3.389
2024-03-15
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:Purpose This study aimed to assess the imaging features of atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) and lipoma with fat necrosis. Methods This study included patients with histopathologically proven fat necrosis within adipocytic tumors who underwent preoperative imaging. MRI and/or CT findings of fat necrosis associated with lipomatous tumors were retrospectively reviewed, emphasizing the "fatty island sign (FIS)." FISs were defined as well-demarcated, focal fat-containing areas surrounded by more thickened septa compared with other intratumoral septa. Imaging findings of FIS were compared between ALT and lipoma. Results Fat necrosis was histopathologically confirmed in 17 patients (6 ALTs and 11 lipomas). Among them, 18 FISs were observed in 10 lesions (59%). Multiple FISs within a lesion were observed in 4 (40%) patients. The median maximum diameter of the FISs was 37 mm. Hypointense areas within FISs relative to the subcutaneous fat on T1-and T2-weighted images were observed in 8 (80%) and 9 (90%), respectively, whereas hyperintense areas within FISs on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images was observed in 2 (20%). Non-fatty solid components within FISs were observed in 2 (20%). On CT, increased fat attenuation and pure fat attenuation within FISs were observed in 6 (86%) and 1 (14%), respectively. Imanging findings of FIS were not significantly different between ALT and lipoma. Conclusion FISs were observed in 59% of the histologically proven ALT and lipoma with fat necrosis. The hypointense areas relative to the subcutaneous fat on T1-and T2-wighted images and increased fat attenuation on CT were usually observed within FISs.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?