Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann,Filip M. Vanhoenacker,Joan C. Vilanova,Alberto S. Tagliafico,Marc-André Weber,Radhesh K. Lalam,Thomas Grieser,Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska,Jacky W. J. de Rooy,Olympia Papakonstantinou,Catherine Mccarthy,Luca Maria Sconfienza,Koenraad Verstraete,José Martel-Villagrán,Pavol Szomolanyi,Frédéric E. Lecouvet,Diana Afonso,Omar M. Albtoush,Giacomo Aringhieri,Remide Arkun,Gunnar Aström,Alberto Bazzocchi,Rajesh Botchu,Martin Breitenseher,Snehansh Chaudhary,Danoob Dalili,Mark Davies,Milko C. de Jonge,Berna D. Mete,Jan Fritz,Jan L. M. A. Gielen,Geoff Hide,Amanda Isaac,Slavcho Ivanoski,Ramy M. Mansour,Lorenzo Muntaner-Gimbernat,Ana Navas,Paul O´Donnell,Şebnem Örgüç,Winston Rennie,Santiago Resano,Philip Robinson,Hatice T. Sanal,Simone A. J. Ter Horst,Kirsten van Langevelde,Klaus Wörtler,Marita Koelz,Joannis Panotopoulos,Reinhard Windhager,Johannes L. Bloem

Abstract:Abstract Objectives Early, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To this end, standardization of imaging algorithms, technical requirements, and reporting is therefore a prerequisite. Since the first European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus in 2015, technical achievements, further insights into specific entities, and the revised WHO-classification (2020) and AJCC staging system (2017) made an update necessary. The guidelines are intended to support radiologists in their decision-making and contribute to interdisciplinary tumor board discussions. Materials and methods A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements were scored online by level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds. Either “group consensus,” “group agreement,” or “lack of agreement” was achieved. Results Eight sections were defined that finally contained 145 statements with comments. Overall, group consensus was reached in 95.9%, and group agreement in 4.1%. This communication contains the first part consisting of the imaging algorithm for suspected soft tissue tumors, methods for local imaging, and the role of tumor centers. Conclusion Ultrasound represents the initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small tumors. MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of most soft tissue tumors. CT is indicated in special situations. In suspicious or likely malignant tumors, a specialist tumor center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion. This should be done before performing a biopsy, without exception. Clinical relevance The updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging, to support radiologists in their decision-making, and to improve examination comparability both in individual patients and in future studies on individualized strategies. Key Points • Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors. • MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy. • In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.

Imaging of Adult Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors of the Spinal Canal: A Guide for Spine Surgeons

Advances in imaging modalities for spinal tumors

Imaging Characteristics of Intrasellar Cavernous Hemangioma

Imaging of Malignant Primitive Tumors of the Spine

Conventional and Advanced Imaging of Spinal Cord Tumors

Understanding a mass in the paraspinal region: an anatomical approach

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology-Guidelines 2023—overview, and primary local imaging: how and where?

Exophytic primary spinal intramedullary glioblastoma: A case report and critical review of literature.

Imaging features and differential diagnosis of malignant vascular tumor of spine

Sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar masses: Imaging features and neurosurgical approaches

Imaging Appearances of Benign and Malignant Schwannoma of Spine and Differential Diagnosis

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: whole-body staging in sarcoma, non-malignant entities requiring special algorithms, pitfalls and special imaging aspects. Guidelines 2024 from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)

MRI of Intraspinal occupying lesion

Imaging Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Adult Brain Tumors

Spinal Cellular Schwannoma: an Analysis of Imaging Manifestation and Clinicopathological Findings.

Narrative review-diagnosing and managing malignant epidural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based approach

Synovial sarcoma of the spine: a case involving paraspinal muscle with extensive calcification and the surgical consideration in treatment

Imaging of Cervical Spine Trauma: Update of Techniques and Clinical Relevance

Rare Radiographic Changes in a Cervicomedullary Spinal Ependymoma After Biopsy and Drainage of an Intratumoral Cyst: A Staged Approach

Spinal Giant Cell Tumor:Imaging Features and Its Clinical Value

Advances in Imaging for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: A Comprehensive Review of Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning