Abstract:Highly automated vehicles (HAVs) will interact with pedestrians in urban environments. This requires efficient communication tools to ensure mutual understanding. Past research showed that pedestrians mostly used vehicle kinematics to communicate with vehicles, e.g., the vehicle's speed and distance. However, pedestrians required further explicit communication signals when the traffic situation was ambiguous. Light-band external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) transmit additional explicit communication signals to pedestrians, e.g., the vehicle's yielding intent. To this point, the precise interplay of vehicle kinematics and eHMIs for HAVs has not yet been determined. Nevertheless, previous research showed that combining both means of communication has great potential to increase pedestrian perceived safety and to ensure a safe interaction. Only a little research used real vehicle studies to investigate the interaction between pedestrians and HAVs in a close-to-reality experimental setting. However, this would ensure the transferability of experimental results to future urban traffic. Therefore, this study aimed to address this research gap by investigating the effects of vehicle kinematics, eHMIs, and their interplay in a real-world pedestrian crossing on pedestrians' behaviors and subjective evaluations. In this field experiment, we applied a light-band eHMI on a Wizard-of-Oz test vehicle, an actual vehicle instructed as an HAV. We investigated the effects of vehicle kinematics (early yielding vs. late yielding) and the eHMI status (no eHMI, static eHMI, dynamic eHMI) on pedestrians' crossing behavior and subjective evaluation in a low-speed real-world setting. The static eHMI displayed the vehicle automation status by a static illuminated eHMI. The dynamic eHMI conveyed the automation status and the vehicle's yielding intent. This study focused particularly on the interplay of vehicle kinematics and eHMI status. We assumed that the crossing initiation was shorter when a dynamic eHMI was combined with an early yielding compared to a late yielding in this real-world setting. Moreover, we hypothesized that pedestrians' subjective evaluations are more positive for a well-coordinated interplay of eHMI and vehicle kinematics. The results showed that pedestrians initiated their crossing earlier with dynamic eHMI vs. no eHMI or static eHMI. Furthermore, they perceived a dynamic eHMI as safer and more trustworthy compared to no eHMI or a static eHMI. Combining an early yielding and dynamic eHMI increased participants' perceived safety of the vehicle behavior and trust and improved pedestrians' affective evaluations compared to a late yielding with dynamic eHMI. Overall, this real vehicle study highlighted the importance of implicit and explicit communication signals and their well-coordinated interplay for pedestrians' future interactions with HAVs in a real-world setting.

Pedestrians' intent to cross in a fully autonomous vehicle environment; looking at crossing opportunity, eHMI message and wait time

Forecasting the Evolution of Urban Mobility: the Influence of Anthropomorphism and Social Responsiveness in the Transition from Human to Automated Driving

Crossing roads in a social context: How behaviors of others shape pedestrian interaction with automated vehicles

External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions

Hello, is it me you're Stopping for? The Effect of external Human Machine Interface Familiarity on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour in an Ambiguous Situation

From Visions to Reality: Investigating the Interplay of Vehicle Kinematics and Light-band eHMI in a Real Vehicle Study

Pedestrian and Passenger Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles: Field Study in a Crosswalk Scenario

Pedestrians' responses to scalable automated vehicles with different external human-machine interfaces: Evidence from a video-based eye-tracking experiment

Using a Configurational Approach to Examine the Impacts of Vehicle Appearance Perception on Pedestrian Acceptance of the External Human-Machine Interfaces on Autonomous Vehicles

Impact of External Human–Machine Interface Communication Strategies of Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Crossing Decisions and Behaviors in an Urban Environment

Analysis of the Interaction between Humans and Autonomous Vehicles Equipped with External Human–Machine Interfaces: The Effect of an Experimental Reward Mechanism on Pedestrian Crossing Behavior in a Virtual Environment

Not Always Good: Mitigating Pedestrians' Less Careful Crossing Behavior by External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles

Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics

Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions

Exploring the Impact of Interconnected External Interfaces in Autonomous Vehicleson Pedestrian Safety and Experience

Human-vehicle interaction for autonomous vehicles in crosswalk scenarios: Field experiments with pedestrians and passengers

Matching vs. Mismatching Signals of External Human-Machine Interface and Vehicle Kinematics: An Examination of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior and Trust, Safety, and Affective Ratings in Interactions with Differently Sized Automated Vehicles

Communicating the intention of an automated vehicle to pedestrians: The contributions of eHMI and vehicle behavior

Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: Exploring a motion-based approach for virtual reality experiments

Deconstructing Pedestrian Crossing Decision-making in Interactions with Continuous Traffic: an Anthropomorphic Model

The Effectiveness of eHMI Displays on Pedestrian-Autonomous Vehicle Interaction in Mixed-Traffic Environments