Effect of sensitization on primary cadaveric renal allograft survival following deliberate unrelated blood transfusions

Susan Martin,Philip A. Dyer,John Manos,Ram Gokal,Netar P. Mallick,All Bakran,Robert W. G. Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.1987.tb00677.x
1987-12-01
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:One‐hundred‐and‐forty‐seven patients entered a program of planned transfusions prior to renal transplantation. Panel reactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies (PRA) were produced by 28 (19%) of the patients but in only 7 (4.8%) did the antibodies react with more than 10% of the panel cells (n = 40). Eighty‐seven patients were transplanted, of whom 20.7% had been sensitized following their transfusions. Of those not yet transplanted, 16.7% are sensitized. The mean waiting time for those patients who have been transplanted was 9.9 months and for those still waiting is 16.6 months. Waiting times were not influenced by sensitization. Actuarial graft survival is the same in the groups that did and did not have PRA pretransplant (77.8% and 76.4% at 1 year, respectively). Of the 64 patients who were unsensitized pretransplant, 16 (25%) did and 48 (75%) did not produce PRA posttransplant: their actuarial graft survivals at 1 yr are 62.5% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.04). We conclude that good graft survival is achieved following planned transfusions; posttransfusion sensitization is low and does not prevent patients from receiving a transplant nor adversely affect subsequent graft survival. Conversely, the production of PRA posttransplant is related to significantly poorer graft outcome.
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?