Abstract:Integrated assessment models (IAMs) are a central tool for the quantitative analysis of climate change mitigation strategies. However, due to their global, cross-sectoral and centennial scope, IAMs cannot explicitly represent the temporal and spatial details required to properly analyze the key role of variable renewable energy (VRE) in decarbonizing the power sector and enabling emission reductions through end-use electrification. In contrast, power sector models (PSMs) can incorporate high spatiotemporal resolutions but tend to have narrower sectoral and geographic scopes and shorter time horizons. To overcome these limitations, here we present a novel methodology: an iterative and fully automated soft-coupling framework that combines the strengths of a long-term IAM and a detailed PSM. The key innovation is that the framework uses the market values of power generations and the capture prices of demand flexibilities in the PSM as price signals that change the capacity and power mix of the IAM. Hence, both models make endogenous investment decisions, leading to a joint solution. We apply the method to Germany in a proof-of-concept study using the IAM REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 and the PSM Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2 and confirm the theoretical prediction of almost-full convergence in terms of both decision variables and (shadow) prices. At the end of the iterative process, the absolute model difference between the generation shares of any generator type for any year is < 5 % for a simple configuration (no storage, no flexible demand) under a "proof-of-concept" baseline scenario and 6 %–7 % for a more realistic and detailed configuration (with storage and flexible demand). For the simple configuration, we mathematically show that this coupling scheme corresponds uniquely to an iterative mapping of the Lagrangians of two power sector optimization problems of different time resolutions, which can lead to a comprehensive model convergence of both decision variables and (shadow) prices. The remaining differences in the two models can be explained by a slight mismatch between the standing capacities in the real world and optimal modeling solutions based purely on cost competition. Since our approach is based on fundamental economic principles, it is also applicable to other IAM–PSM pairs.

Integration of a computable general equilibrium model with an energy system model: Application of the AIM global model

Integration of energy system and computable general equilibrium models: An approach complementing energy and economic representations for mitigation analysis

The Future Development of Energy- Environment-Economy Integrated Assessment Modelling

emIAM v1.0: an emulator for Integrated Assessment Models using marginal abatement cost curves

Integration of an energy– economy model with an urban energy model

Ssp3: Aim Implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Coupling an integrated assessment model with an input–output database

Exploring the possibility space: taking stock of the diverse capabilities and gaps in integrated assessment models

Bidirectional coupling of a long-term integrated assessment model REMIND v3.0.0 with an hourly power sector model DIETER v1.0.2

Environmental impact assessment for climate change policy with the simulation-based integrated assessment model E3ME-FTT-GENIE

Comparing energy system optimization models and integrated assessment models: Relevance for energy policy advice

Key Factors Influencing the Global Passenger Transport Dynamics Using the AIM/transport Model

Multi-model analyses of the economic and energy implications for China and India in a post-Kyoto climate regime

A systemic approach to analyze integrated energy system modeling tools: A review of national models

Bidirectional coupling of the long-term integrated assessment model REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 with the hourly power sector model Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2

Global multi regional CGE model with its 3E extensions

An Improved Input–output Model for Energy Analysis: A Case Study of Suzhou

Review of Hybrid Approaches of Energy-Economy-environmental System Model

Multi-model Comparison of the Economic and Energy Implications for China and India in an International Climate Regime

Chinese integrated energy-economy-environment assessment model

The Role of Multi-Region Integrated Emissions Trading Scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis