Is there a treatable cause of repeated implantation failure, or is it simply treatment failure by chance?

E. Cutting,KS. Abdallah,BW Mol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103845
IF: 4.567
2024-02-03
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Abstract:Research Question Does repeated implantation failure in some cases have a cause, or is it simply treatment failure by chance? Design A hypothetical model for a cohort of 1000 women undergoing four repeated IVF attempts was constructed. A proportion of women with RIF carried an underlying risk factor negatively affecting implantation, compared with women without the factor. Strategy A, women had standard IVF without additional treatment compared to strategy B, women had standard IVF and were exposed to an additional treatment. Sensitivity analysis varied the prevalence of underlying risk factor from 5%-50%. The model was compared to studies within the literature. Results Strategy A, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased with subsequent IVF attempts (31% in the 1 st transfer with risk factor prevalence 5%, to 8% in the 4 th transfer with risk factor prevalence of 50%). As prevalence increased, clinical pregnancy rate was stronger in strategy A. For strategy B, the clinical pregnancy rates for the modelled cohort decreased with each subsequent IVF attempt. Regardless of the prevalence of risk factor, the decline in clinical pregnancy rate was less strong (32% in 1st transfer with prevalence of 5% to 25% in the 4th transfer with prevalence of 50%). The model was then compared with studies within the literature. When analysed with our model, the trends expected for strategy B (decreasing clinical pregnancy rates) were not expressed. Conclusions RIF might be of iatrogenic origin due to the low success rate of IVF and might be triggered by the increasing female age associated with higher numbers of RIF.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?