Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">The Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations (PCE) are widely used and advocated in guidelines for predicting 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. Over the past few decades, these models have been extensively validated within different populations, which provided mounting evidence that local tailoring is often necessary to obtain accurate predictions. The objective is to systematically review and summarize the predictive performance of three widely advocated cardiovascular risk prediction models (Framingham Wilson 1998, Framingham ATP III 2002 and PCE 2013) in men and women separately, to assess the generalizability of performance across different subgroups and geographical regions, and to determine sources of heterogeneity in the findings across studies.</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">A search was performed in October 2017 to identify studies investigating the predictive performance of the aforementioned models. Studies were included if they externally validated one or more of the original models in the general population for the same outcome as the original model. We assessed risk of bias for each validation and extracted data on population characteristics and model performance. Performance estimates (observed versus expected (OE) ratio and c-statistic) were summarized using a random effects models and sources of heterogeneity were explored with meta-regression.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">The search identified 1585 studies, of which 38 were included, describing a total of 112 external validations. Results indicate that, on average, all models overestimate the 10-year risk of CHD and CVD (pooled OE ratio ranged from 0.58 (95% CI 0.43–0.73; Wilson men) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.60–0.97; ATP III women)). Overestimation was most pronounced for high-risk individuals and European populations. Further, discriminative performance was better in women for all models. There was considerable heterogeneity in the c-statistic between studies, likely due to differences in population characteristics.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">The Framingham Wilson, ATP III and PCE discriminate comparably well but all overestimate the risk of developing CVD, especially in higher risk populations. Because the extent of miscalibration substantially varied across settings, we highly recommend that researchers further explore reasons for overprediction and that the models be updated for specific populations.</p>

Assessment of Maximum Heart Rate Prediction Equations in Adults at Low and High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Validity of the Maximal Heart Rate Prediction Models among Runners and Cyclists

The Validity of Predicting the Maximum Heart Rate of College Students in China from Age

Old and new equations for maximal and anaerobic threshold heart rate prediction in coronary heart disease in Chinese population

Nonexercise machine learning models for maximal oxygen uptake prediction in national population surveys

Estimating exercise intensity using heart rate in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease: Are established methods valid?

Failure of predicted VO2peak to discriminate physical fitness in epidemiological studies

Improving Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Through Machine Learning Modelling of Irregularly Repeated Electronic Health Records

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Accurate Prediction Equations for Ventilatory Thresholds in Cardiometabolic Disease When Gas Exchange Analysis is Unavailable: Development and Validation

Predicting “Heart Age” Using Electrocardiography

Validation of American Heart Association PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease Risk Equations

Development, validation, and transportability of several machine-learned, non-exercise-based VO2max prediction models for older adults

External Validation of the American Heart Association PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease Risk Equations

Population and Age-Based Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level Investigation and Automatic Prediction

Cardiovascular risk prediction in healthy older people

Ten-Year Risk Equations for Incident Heart Failure in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Populations

Evaluating risk prediction models for adults with heart failure: A systematic literature review

Heart rate response and recovery in bicycle exercise testing - reference values and association with mortality

Anthropometric measures in cardiovascular disease prediction: comparison of laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based model

Assessing patients with possible heart disease using scores