Parental Somatic Mosaicism Detected During Prenatal Diagnosis

Natalie J. Chandler,Elizabeth Scotchman,Fiona McKay,Vijaya Ramachandran,Lyn S. Chitty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6712
2024-12-01
Prenatal Diagnosis
Abstract:Objective Accurate recurrence risks are essential for genomic counselling and parental reproductive choices. Historically, Sanger sequencing was used to test parental samples, which has a limited sensitivity of ∼ 10% for detecting somatic mosaicism. Next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, utilised for non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and trio prenatal exome sequencing in our laboratory, have greater sensitivity. Here we review the cases of parental somatic mosaicism we have detected and discuss its impact on management. Method Laboratory databases from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2022 were reviewed to identify all cases where parental somatic mosaicism was detected during NIPD and prenatal exome testing. Results During the development of NIPD testing, we identified 10/131 (7.6%) families with parental somatic mosaicism. In six cases where NGS detected levels between 0.37% and 8.82%, prior testing with Sanger sequencing had not detected mosaicism. In our exome sequencing cohort, we detected parental mosaicism in 4/101 (3.96%) cases. Clinical features of the condition were identified in 2/14 parents. Conclusion The sensitivity of the testing technique needs to be considered when counselling parents on recurrence risk. Parents need to be aware that modern approaches to prenatal diagnosis may allow identification of mosaicism, which may have implications for their own health and change recurrence risks for future pregnancies.
genetics & heredity,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?